Open JuliusQv opened 8 months ago
Thanks for your excellent work. I used the default parameter settings in the repo,and got a very different performance on the DTU dataset worse than in the paper. scan24 0.446 , but your paper is 0.375. scan37 0.968,but your paper is 0.537. Do you have any suggestions?
Hello, I tried to evaluate the trained DTU model and ran eval. py, but received an error (ValueError: Found array with 0 sample (s) (shape=(0,3)) while a minimum of 1 is required by NearestNeighbors.). May I ask how you obtained this result with scan24=0.446 and what code was used?
I use the default repo. Maybe you can check if the predicted mesh or gt mesh is empty.
Thanks for your excellent work.
I used the default parameter settings in the repo,and got a very different performance on the DTU dataset worse than in the paper.
scan24 0.446 , but your paper is 0.375. scan37 0.968,but your paper is 0.537.
Do you have any suggestions?