Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
Issue 104 has been merged into this issue.
Original comment by Canada.R...@gmail.com
on 18 Oct 2010 at 12:58
This seems to be the same problem I had with the output from the new
CvarSettings.sp where the output would appear to reach a max number of
ReplyToCommand()'s and the client wouldn't be able to deal with it. Two
courses of action I see:
1) Use the same index system
2) Depreciate this command since confogl_cvarsettings does the same thing but
with even more ConVars. We could even rename confogl_cvarsettings to
confogl_cvars actually.
Original comment by Canada.R...@gmail.com
on 18 Oct 2010 at 1:04
#2 would be the "good" solution if it is feature-complete I suppose. If we will
be missing cvars from one or the other it could be an issue.
Original comment by prodigysim@gmail.com
on 18 Oct 2010 at 2:47
Right now it reports all ConVars set with confogl_addcvar/confogl_setcvar so
unless the .cfg is missing ConVars, it will include them all, plus the
non-confogl ConVars (ex sv_cheats, mp_gamemode). And it also reports
differences from the current and desired values with confogl_cvardiff
Original comment by Canada.R...@gmail.com
on 18 Oct 2010 at 3:25
As of 0b744bfff4 these commands have been replaced with confogl_cvarsettings
and confogl_cvardiff.
Original comment by Canada.R...@gmail.com
on 3 Nov 2010 at 7:16
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
avbetev@gmail.com
on 17 Oct 2010 at 4:01Attachments: