chore: Update NuGet restore command to use dotnet instead of nuget

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 95.16%. Comparing base (266bbf7) to head (79efc24).

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## develop #43 +/- ## ======================================== Coverage 95.16% 95.16% ======================================== Files 15 15 Lines 124 124 Branches 4 4 ======================================== Hits 118 118 Misses 6 6 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/GiessC/in-ctrl/pull/43/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Collin+Giess) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [infra-unit](https://app.codecov.io/gh/GiessC/in-ctrl/pull/43/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Collin+Giess) | `97.33% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Collin+Giess#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

GiessC / in-ctrl

chore: Update NuGet restore command to use dotnet instead of nuget #43

Codecov Report

Quality Gate passed