Implementation of the Connection.GetSchema of the DataSourceInformation collection

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 88.73%. Comparing base (292bc55) to head (028df4d).

:exclamation: Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## develop #190 +/- ## =========================================== + Coverage 88.38% 88.73% +0.35% =========================================== Files 54 54 Lines 1756 1802 +46 Branches 239 239 =========================================== + Hits 1552 1599 +47 + Misses 146 145 -1 Partials 58 58 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9157409247

Details

• 46 of 46 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage increased (+0.2%) to 90.42%

---

Totals
Change from base Build 9156112100:	0.2%
Covered Lines:	1657
Relevant Lines:	1802

---

💛 - Coveralls

[Giorgi]

Is it possible to test it some other way? I.E what uses connection.GetSchema("DataSourceInformation")?

[magneto-81]

Connection.GetSchema("DataSourceInformation") is used by generic software which, through the ado.net providers, allows its use. The information returned by this primitive is used to generate statements in a generic way (see for example DbMetaDataColumnNames.ParameterMarkerPattern).

[Giorgi]

Can you add a test that uses those APIs (that call Connection.GetSchema("DataSourceInformation")) under the hood to validate that it generates correct statements? That would increase the confidence of this change a lot.