Closed shvachko closed 9 years ago
Fixed what Idea suggests and seems reasonable. Didn't touch BlockManagementAgent and NamespaceAgent due of upcoming #94
There is a lot of unrelated changes, like
So the patch needs some cleaning up.
sure, qualifiers are more style fixes then warnings. interfaces usually static fields. but let's be explicit. as for ordering we need to define style to avoid ordering by hand. something like https://google-styleguide.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/javaguide.html#s3.3-import-statements I'll revert that back.
fixed, thank you for reviewing.
GiraffaFileSystem
. Please remove.
//noinspection StatementWithEmptyBody
@SuppressWarnings("deprecation")
. I don't see any warnings in GiraffaFileSystem
.@SuppressWarnings("ALL")
is cheating - doesn't work. If there is no way to fix, just leave them with a proper explanation. But I don't see any warnings GiraffaProtos
.RowKeyBytes
. Don't change it. You can fix it in another jira if this is a bug, which I personally don't see.GiraffaFileServlet
, GiraffaHbaseServlet
and GiraffaWebUtils
are in web package, should not be in this jira.TestDirectoryTable
does not have any warnings, why did you change it?TestGiraffaUpgrade
still has two warnings: unused blockID
and genStamp
.I used Intellij warnings, so that is sort of combined issue with #97. I'd rather will not do this issue. Sorry to taking it.
I updated issue-104 branch, but did not create a new pull request. Please review the branch, just compare it to trunk.
+1; tests passing and changes look good.
Committed. Thanks everybody for working on it.
We have a lot of Java warnings. Fix them excluding WebUI for now.