While working on a PR for issue #8 if found what I believe are inconstancies in the way some comparison operators are inverted. For example: >= inverts to <=, I posit it should invert to <. The way I see it >= is inclusive of the value its comparing, therefore the inverted operator should not, hence < and not <= (which does).
While working on a PR for issue #8 if found what I believe are inconstancies in the way some comparison operators are inverted. For example:
>=
inverts to<=
, I posit it should invert to<
. The way I see it>=
is inclusive of the value its comparing, therefore the inverted operator should not, hence<
and not<=
(which does).The following should be corrected:
If you agree I will submit a PR correcting this.