Closed laurenluz closed 1 year ago
I think comms team can do it at adminbro themselves. @WhyldWanderer can manage it easily I guess.
I can remove those tokens...
Im curious how this coincides with the process of token nomination in the forum. Will the process for nominating tokens still be the same?
The tokens have been removed!
@laurenluz can you edit your original forum post to exclude these tokens? And/or maybe make a comment that explains what happened or something?
@MoeNick Should I move this issue to QA now? Whats the flow for this one?
@MoeNick @WhyldWanderer Yeah you are totally right it can be done by admin panel, and you don't need to remove token, you just should edit token and unmark to is Givback Eligible checkbox
I moved it to QA for more review by @laurenluz or @maryjaf on production.
@brichis can you pleae take a look at giveth,io and make sure the changes are correct?
Hey @MoeNick I already reviewed the list and everything is right :) only a question, do we still accepting donations in coins like UST, LUNA, etc.?
@brichis - he's asking if you can go to the dApp on production and double check to make sure that the list of tokens is the same as the list here. Did you do that?
We should not have UST or LUNA in drop down list anymore on the dapp. Can you check?
I checked that every token in the list doesn't have GIV elegible icon on Giveth.io but for example LUNA is still available to donate, the only thing is that you won't receive GIVbacks for that donation. @laurenluz Is ok like that? Tomorrow I can check again if I miss something :)
I think it's better if we remove then from the drop down list all together. @brichis @MoeNick
UST & LUNA are embarassing at this point
GM! @laurenluz @MoeNick I did a quick review as Griff told me but I think we still accepting donations with that tokens
I don't have access to the production admin, but I tested the following scenario on the stage I disabled the "Is Givback Eligible" for the X-node token from the admin panel But it is still displayed in the list of tokens
It seems that the function of disabling this field does not work properly
I don't have access to the production admin, but I tested the following scenario on the stage I disabled the "Is Givback Eligible" for the X-node token from the admin panel But it is still displayed in the list of tokens It seems that the function of disabling this field does not work properly
@RamRamez @MohammadPCh
Do you filter tokens with isGivbackEligible
field, in this place?
or if you expect we dont return non givback eligible tokens in get tokens web service tell us to change the backend web service
I don't have access to the production admin, but I tested the following scenario on the stage I disabled the "Is Givback Eligible" for the X-node token from the admin panel But it is still displayed in the list of tokens It seems that the function of disabling this field does not work properly
@RamRamez @MohammadPCh Do you filter tokens with
isGivbackEligible
field, in this place? or if you expect we dont return non givback eligible tokens in get tokens web service tell us to change the backend web service
We don't filter, we show all tokens. Givback eligible tokens have a hand
icon beside it and in @maryjaf pic, there is no icon for XNODE so it's ok
@RamRamez thanks man
So are you going to remove them from DB or are you going to create a remove option in admin? @mohammadranjbarz
@brichis - are you sure that USDT should be removed from gnosis chain? @Cotabe is saying that there is good liquidity
I'm saying I think so... Unfortunately, its not so easy to see. But I made my research. This is what I found:
Honeyswap has about 2.5 K USD in liquidity Sushiswap has about 75 K USD in liquidity
These come from coinmarketcap, but I belive they are the same than the ones in Sushi swap.
I made a 1 K swap on Monday XDAI to USDT, no slippage (or minimal). But I'm testing the same in sushiswap and there is some 3% slippage right now. It's hard for me to make more sense out of this numbers. But maybe Griff can help with this with all the research made.
Hey @Cotabe @laurenluz I'm watching my spreadsheet and I'm seeing that I only considered HoneySwap and that's why I didn't considered enough liquidity, I can do a second review :) Is there another source that I should check? I checked Coingecko and Honeyswap, I can check too Sushi and Coinmarket Cap. Thanks for the feedback Cotabe! https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Wpsdx9Kii1vWlP6qNlP_pHpSBQvQQVtbLfM6MOUX74o/edit#gid=267197215
It's hard to see... or at least I don't consider myself an expert at it by any means. But what you can do is simulate that you are going to make a swap in transferto.xyz, it will tell you what's the best route, aka, which DEX has more liquidity. It seems 1inche has more liquidity right now
And then go in there and try to find more info. In some DEXes is easier in other it's trickier. But it seems its actually coming out of curve.
and then on Curve I just found the liquidity on the pools, search for USDT here https://curve.fi/#/gnosis/pools
Then you can go on this one and see the is 4M USDT liquidity paired with a similar amount of USDC and XDAI https://curve.fi/#/gnosis/pools/3pool/deposit
@brichis - this is also a good question to ask @GriffGreen
Thanks @laurenluz and @Cotabe, I'll ask to Griff about next steps :)
The best way to check is to try trading them on cowswap... if the slippage is bigger than 3% for $10000 trade... we should exclude it...
I would test CRV & xMoon
CowSwap, Curve & HoneySwap
I think, it passes. Honeyswap is just not seing the liquidity in curve
looks good to me - +$2M liquidity on curve!
@mohammadranjbarz @CarlosQ96 can we add a delete button only for the admin role in the token page?
@mohammadranjbarz @CarlosQ96 can we add a delete button only for the admin role in the token page?
Yeah it's an easy job
This can now me done in admin bro - @NikolaCreatrix or @WhyldWanderer - can you delete these tokens?
@laurenluz I'd gladly do that cause I just figured out how and where, but I don't have the right role for that (my access is limited so I don't do any harm :P), and I think that would be on @WhyldWanderer to assess if I am trustworthy enough to get it, so then @CarlosQ96 could do it for me...and tadaaaa, I can delete those tokens.
@laurenluz - I already deleted the ones from the original post.
Are there more that need to be deleted? Which ones?
who's gonna QA it?
@brichis can you pls check and confirm
Sure! @MoeNick
Hi @MoeNick!
The tokens are not eligible for GIVbacks but LUNA or UST are still listed
@WhyldWanderer @NikolaCreatrix I guess it needs your attention again. :)
Yeah I wish, I can see it, I could delete it right now, but I can't because my access is limited. So again, if we can upgrade my adminbro powers @WhyldWanderer, I am happy to support...
DONE!
can we move this to finished?
@maryjaf please check all tokens
Giveback is not eligible for all tokens listed in the description Only for these two tokens: UST(mainnet) xMOON(xDAI) they are not displayed in the list of tokens
@brichis did some great work to determine which tokens on the GIVbacks token list where very volatile or with low liquidity that we should now remove.
Here is the list from the forum.
Mainnet GIVbacks Token List
xDai GIVbacks Token List
More detailed analysis can be found in this spreadsheet FYI
@mohammadranjbarz or @CarlosQ96 - can you take this?
cc @MoeNick