Most space agency use classic metrics of spatial error (even though those don't tell so much for DEMs sometimes because of long-range correlations), such as LE90, CE90, and/or SE90 corresponding to 90% probable vertical, horizontal, and 3d spherical radial error. See for instance PGC or TanDEM-X products.
We should include those. Maybe a reference document to use for this would be nice.
Most space agency use classic metrics of spatial error (even though those don't tell so much for DEMs sometimes because of long-range correlations), such as LE90, CE90, and/or SE90 corresponding to 90% probable vertical, horizontal, and 3d spherical radial error. See for instance PGC or TanDEM-X products.
We should include those. Maybe a reference document to use for this would be nice.
Some references we could point towards: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1681-7575/ab1705#metab1705s3 https://www.asprs.org/wp-content/uploads/Lidar_Guidelines_3-19-2018.pdf https://pythonhosted.org/uncertainties/ https://www.asprs.org/revisions-to-the-asprs-positional-accuracy-standards-for-geospatial-data-2023