nus-se-script
commented
11 months ago Team's Response
No details provided by team.
The 'Original' Bug
[The team marked this bug as a duplicate of the following bug]
DG: Inconsistent format for finding stalls by stall name
Note from the teaching team: This bug was reported during the Part II (Evaluating Documents) stage of the PE. You may reject this bug if it is not related to the quality of documentation.
Point 4 format is uncorrected. Expected:No stall is found..... should be on the next line
[original: nus-cs2103-AY2324S1/pe-interim#5337] [original labels: type.DocumentationBug severity.VeryLow]
Their Response to the 'Original' Bug
[This is the team's response to the above 'original' bug]
Should be categorised as not in scope as it does not hinder the reader as per website.
Items for the Tester to Verify
:question: Issue duplicate status
Team chose to mark this issue as a duplicate of another issue (as explained in the Team's response above)
- [x] I disagree
Reason for disagreement: According to the definition of duplicates,
(b) Multiple buggy behaviors that are actually caused by the same defect and cannot be fixed independently (i.e., fixing one fixes the others automatically).
This documentation bug in the paragraph "Finding stalls by stall location" is of a different paragraph from the Original bug from paragraph "Finding stalls by stall name". Even though it has the same formatting error, they cannot be fixed independently, and are thus not considered duplicates.
Furthermore, there were no justifications provided as to why they believe that this bug was a duplicate.
The following forum issues are also several justifications to support my disagreement:
## :question: Issue response Team chose [`response.NotInScope`] - [ ] I disagree **Reason for disagreement:** [replace this with your explanation]
Point 4 format is uncorrected. Expected:No stall is found..... should be on the next line