Closed nerdkid93 closed 3 years ago
Hello,
Yes, it is true that some libraries of the application are not open source and some libraries are located in another account. I am thinking about regrouping it all under this account and opening it up yes.
Would you be interested in contributing? Or is there something you need in the meantime (FYI: The documentation issue you mentioned has now been fixed).
I had just noticed the documentation link issue and had planned on submitting a PR to fix the links (esp. since it's Hacktoberfest). When I noticed that most of the code is actually in the base package, I searched through the GitHub issues to see if anyone had brought this up before. When I didn't find anything, I figured it wouldn't hurt to ask if this structure was intentional or not.
So no, I don't have anything I need. :smile: I just wanted to be a good OSS community member and contribute back.
Everything is now public and under the same user (Still some need for documentation though. I will work on that soon). Closing this issue
Hello,
I was pointed in your direction by the Enonic team for using your app in XP, but I just noticed that there's no code in this repo. It seems to be housed in another private repository, yet you have this published as
Apache-2.0
. Would you consider opening up the actual source code for this application?Thanks