Glottotopia
commented
10 years ago No Problem to separate grammatical and lexical glosses. NB: With very many exx, grammatical glosses will bubble up automatically
olovick notifications@github.com schrieb:
We were thinking that it would be much easier to find (grammatical) gloss tags if we separated grammatical from lexical glosses. Right now, it is still marginally doable, but once we have more data on there, it'll be a complete pain because of the sheer number of potential lexical glosses. Additionally, it is unlikely that someone would search for "sleep" but very likely that the person would look for "OPT" or some such.
Is there a way we could use capitalization to automatically separate grammatical from lexical glosses, taking the ELAN files as input? Or something else? Typecraft of course does this automatically, but the output of Typecraft in general is not as nice (lack of hyphens in particular). It'd be nice if we could keep using ELAN.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/Glottotopia/athagram/issues/11
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
We were thinking that it would be much easier to find (grammatical) gloss tags if we separated grammatical from lexical glosses. Right now, it is still marginally doable, but once we have more data on there, it'll be a complete pain because of the sheer number of potential lexical glosses. Additionally, it is unlikely that someone would search for "sleep" but very likely that the person would look for "OPT" or some such.
Is there a way we could use capitalization to automatically separate grammatical from lexical glosses, taking the ELAN files as input? Or something else? Typecraft of course does this automatically, but the output of Typecraft in general is not as nice (lack of hyphens in particular). It'd be nice if we could keep using ELAN.