Closed olebole closed 4 years ago
Not examples, per se, though that might be a good idea. They were introduced in the early days for testing the functionality with derived types. Testing became more sophisticated later on and these are duplicated in the tests/include/types where there is a Foo module.
I've just pushed a fix that eliminates these, but have only done a very quick test. I will now merge with develop. Let me know if you need a formal release.
I can also remove them manually in the Debian package, no problem. BTW, I am not sure whether I already said that I am going to create official Debian packages for it. Announcement here. Similarly for gftl-shared, fargparse and pfunit.
Cool! If you did mention it before, I missed it.
Thanks!
In
include/types
, gFTL installs the filesFoo.inc
,FooPoly.inc
,FooPolyPtr.inc
, andFooPtr.inc
. These require modules which are not available:This looks like example files; shouldn't they be installed as examples?