GoogleChrome / lighthouse

Automated auditing, performance metrics, and best practices for the web.
https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/overview/
Apache License 2.0
28.29k stars 9.36k forks source link

Lighthouse Report want PNG Cache - BUT .PNG SHOULD NOT BE DONE WITH CACHE #13640

Closed ggmggm closed 2 years ago

ggmggm commented 2 years ago

Lighthouse Report https://googlechrome.github.io/lighthouse/viewer/?psiurl=https://www.juwelenmarkt.de

Serve static content with an efficient cache policy 9 resources found

/juwelier.png(www.juwelenmarkt.de) | None | 56 KiB /b-diamant-schmuck.png(www.juwelenmarkt.de) | None | 5 KiB /b-armband-uhren.png(www.juwelenmarkt.de) | None | 5 KiB /0-alle-gelegenheiten.png(www.juwelenmarkt.de) | None | 4 KiB /paypal.png(www.juwelenmarkt.de) | None | 3 KiB /b-diamanten-brillanten.png(www.juwelenmarkt.de) | None | 3 KiB /down.png(www.juwelenmarkt.de) | None | 2 KiB /top.png(www.juwelenmarkt.de) | None | 2 KiB /juwelier-home.png(www.juwelenmarkt.de)

According to various Internet comments, .PNG SHOULD NOT BE DONE WITH CACHE For example: https://www.dareboost.com/ You should not gzip/deflate PNG images!

Is Lighthouse Report wrong ?

GUNAR

franktopel commented 2 years ago

Please consider changing the title of this issue to something that properly sums up what your issue is about, in English language.

adamraine commented 2 years ago

@ggmggm I see where https://www.dareboost.com/ says you shouldn't gzip png images, but I don't see anything suggesting you shouldn't cache png images. I think Lighthouse is correct on this matter.