Open connorjclark opened 2 years ago
We discussed different ways to add smoke tests:
We aren't super thrilled about option 1 since we would have to maintain 2 smoke runners.
I'm coming around to Connor's original idea to add a callback fn to smoke tests. It might help to increase our flow e2e test coverage without as much mocha boilerplate.
First idea is to add a
callback/runner/idk
property to smoke test definition that takes apage
andflow
and runs a user flow for that.Adam points out it may be too complicated to add this to smokehouse, and may be better to just have jest tests.