Closed stma closed 5 years ago
Those two squares are only touching one mine each, so 1 seems like the correct number.
Seems like. But as you can see, above the left one (4, 1). There is an unrevealed field (4, 0), which probably a mine as well, because it is surrounded twos on the left and right side, that would lead to my hypothesis.
If you look closely you can see additional fields out of view at the top. You could have scrolled further to the top, which means the 2 at (4, 1) is probably touching more unrevealed fields.
I wonder if we need to make the fadeout better.
ouch! That definitely could be. I did not check if I could move up. Sorry for bothering you with that. My bad.
Although a faded arrow to indicate to indicate this is not the edge could be informative.
Sorry for burning your time, thanks your quick response.
I wonder if we need to make the fadeout better.
Or swap it for a shadow that fades out as you reach the end
Debug info mobile screenshot
Describe the bug I think there is a bug with the game field calculation process. As you can see, the state of the game in this pic: Those two field should be indicate 2 instead of 1.
To Reproduce Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Expected behavior Those two field should be indicate 2 instead of 1.
Other pic