Closed stramel closed 4 years ago
The DX of these hooks with typings feels pretty rough. Open to suggestions
Thank you for working on a PR adding typings, @stramel. I see there's already been a request for this in https://github.com/GoogleChromeLabs/react-adaptive-hooks/issues/27. I would like to keep this open to give (1) more users a chance to signal if typings are important to them and (2) more reviewers a chance to chime in on DX.
I think to fix the DX of using types, we always return unsupported
as a boolean
instead of conditionally returning the value or unsupported. useSaveData
already functions similarly to this.
All (the pull request submitter and all commit authors) CLAs are signed, but one or more commits were authored or co-authored by someone other than the pull request submitter.
We need to confirm that all authors are ok with their commits being contributed to this project. Please have them confirm that by leaving a comment that contains only @googlebot I consent.
in this pull request.
Note to project maintainer: There may be cases where the author cannot leave a comment, or the comment is not properly detected as consent. In those cases, you can manually confirm consent of the commit author(s), and set the cla
label to yes
(if enabled on your project).
ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info.
Rebased and updated to match the hook definitions
@stramel cc @addyosmani
Once we've landed https://github.com/GoogleChromeLabs/react-adaptive-hooks/pull/44, I think we can proceed with this PR.
@stramel Could you please check my comments?
@stramel cc @addyosmani
According to typescript handbook, they recommend publishing to the @types organization on npm rather than bundling with the npm package if the package is not written in Typescript.
What are your thoughts on it? :)
Thank you for taking the time to work on typings support for the module and submodules, @stramel. I also appreciate the review here, @anton-karlovskiy.
My personal take is that given the package is not written in TypeScript and we have no short-mid term plans to rewrite it in TS for now, it would make more sense for typings to be published in the @types organization rather than bundling it with this package.
@stramel I think this is a reasonable compromise as it unlocks typings for users that want it. Wdyt?
@addyosmani I can do that
Cool. Thank you! With this in mind, I'm going to go ahead and close this PR. Let's follow up with a PR adding a link/note in the README to the typings package once it lands in the types organization? :)
Added a draft PR for the typings. I need to clean up the typings and add tests.
Is there anyone who would want to help maintain these types?
@addyosmani @anton-karlovskiy
Adds typings for the main module and submodules.