Closed vsoch closed 1 year ago
Hi @vsoch , I am trying to understand the use case you are testing. Are you trying the dynamic or static provisioning? Seems like you are using a PVC without binding it to a PV, which indicates that you are probably using the dynamic provisioning. Please note that the dynamic provisioning is not officially supported for now.
As for the question of "deprecating sidecar containers", what sidecar containers are you referring to here? Can you provide more information and clarification? Thank you!
Closing this issue for now as no detailed information is provided.
Feel free to reopen it if you are still experiencing the same issue.
@songjiaxun Is Dynamic provisioning using only a PVC still not supported? no mention of it in the docs. you said "is not officially supported" - does that mean it's still possible but not officially?
Hi @emouawad , currently, only PV/PVC (static provisioning) and CSI inline volumes are supported. Dynamic provisioning support is on our roadmap, but without any timeline.
As you can see, the repo does include a controller. If you like, you can build the image on your own and try out Dynamic provisioning -- it's possible, but we've not tested the feature for a long time.
Hi again! I am trying to debug why my pods are stuck in pending. Here is a bunch of logs / configs that might shed some light.
Driver logs seem OK:
I'm not sure if this message about "cannot create temp dir" with the read only file system is the bug...
My pod and the sidecar container created for it have no logs (in pending):
Stuck in pending:
The PVC seems OK, it's waiting:
This is how I created it:
Here is a pending pod:
The CSIDriver
The deployment
Seems like there might be failures for the Liveness probe? DaemonSet looks OK
and pods seem OK
I can't think of anything else to show - I hope you can help! Also I heard they are deprecating sidecar contiainers? Is that possibly related / will this not work in the future?