codecov[bot]
commented
1 week ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 72.00%. Comparing base (
3f8314a) to head (e439958).
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #2067 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 71.99% 72.00% ======================================= Files 99 99 Lines 10870 10870 ======================================= + Hits 7826 7827 +1 + Misses 2712 2711 -1 Partials 332 332 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/GoogleCloudPlatform/gcsfuse/pull/2067/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=GoogleCloudPlatform) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/GoogleCloudPlatform/gcsfuse/pull/2067/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=GoogleCloudPlatform) | `72.00% <ø> (+<0.01%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=GoogleCloudPlatform#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Shadow the tc variable so that different subtests refer to their corresponding tc.
It's have been fine had the subtests ran sequentially but in a parallel run, different tests sharing the same tc variable can lead to race.