Closed psx95 closed 9 months ago
This seems reasonable. What is the motivation for the change?
This seems reasonable. What is the motivation for the change?
While working on #267, I noticed this name was confusing when manually using resource detectors (most of our samples were using it via auto-configuration so it went un-noticed before).
Given https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/opentelemetry-operations-java/issues/266 might move this anyways, lets stick with the current naming for now to avoid breaking users unnecessarily.
Given #266 might move this anyways, lets stick with the current naming for now to avoid breaking users unnecessarily.
Sounds good, but do we have a timeline on #266 ?
we can talk about it at triage today
This could be done as part of #266, we can avoid this breaking change in the next release.
This PR contains only refactoring required to accommodate the name change.
This is a breaking change for code depending on
detector-resources
.This change was tested manually as well via the use of auto-exporter.