chore: Remove KFP presubmit SDK tests prow config

[DharmitD]

As part of migration from Prow to GH Action Workflows for KFP, we have a PR proposed to migrate KFP SDK misc tests to a GHA: https://github.com/kubeflow/pipelines/pull/11037

This PR removes KFP SDK tests from the prow config in parallel.

[google-oss-prow[bot]]

Hi @DharmitD. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a GoogleCloudPlatform member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes-sigs/prow](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/prow/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.

[google-oss-prow[bot]]

@hbelmiro: changing LGTM is restricted to collaborators

In response to [this](https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/oss-test-infra/pull/2329#pullrequestreview-2199920739): >LGTM Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes-sigs/prow](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/prow/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.

[hbelmiro]

cc @chensun

[chensun]

We should have the GHA migration done first before we can remove it from prow. Is it this PR: https://github.com/kubeflow/pipelines/pull/11037?

[hbelmiro]

We should have the GHA migration done first before we can remove it from prow. Is it this PR: kubeflow/pipelines#11037?

Yes.

[google-oss-prow[bot]]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: chensun, DharmitD, hbelmiro

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files: - ~~[prow/prowjobs/kubeflow/OWNERS](https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/oss-test-infra/blob/master/prow/prowjobs/kubeflow/OWNERS)~~ [chensun] Approvers can indicate their approval by writing `/approve` in a comment Approvers can cancel approval by writing `/approve cancel` in a comment

[google-oss-prow[bot]]

@DharmitD: Updated the job-config configmap in namespace default at cluster default using the following files:

• key kubeflow-pipelines-presubmits.yaml using file prow/prowjobs/kubeflow/pipelines/kubeflow-pipelines-presubmits.yaml

In response to [this](https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/oss-test-infra/pull/2329): >As part of migration from Prow to GH Action Workflows for KFP, we have a PR proposed to migrate KFP SDK misc tests to a GHA: https://github.com/kubeflow/pipelines/pull/11037 > >This PR removes KFP SDK tests from the prow config in parallel. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available [here](https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/guide/pull-requests.md). If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the [kubernetes-sigs/prow](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/prow/issues/new?title=Prow%20issue:) repository.