Open nj1973 opened 1 year ago
We do have a method to include string length aggregations which is the flag --wildcard-include-string-len or -wisl (Some documentation on it here
I think you may have found a small bug here where we added 'string' to the list of supported data types for aggregate validation but forgot to also add 'string[non-nullable]'.
Can I be assigned this issue?
Character columns are skipped for min/max validations, for example:
I believe this means the only aggregated validation we can do is count. I don't think this is adequate for proving a migration.
Presumably string columns are skipped because of potential problems around localization and multi-byte characters.
Would it be worth having an option stating we trust the source/target data and want to validate the specified string columns?