search

GoogleCodeArchive / hfm-net

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/hfm-net
0 stars 0 forks source link

Capture BAD_WORK_UNIT Result as Failed Work Unit (Count failures on Core b4). #196

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
What enhancement are you proposing?
It appears HFM does not count WU failures from core b4 when the core
reports BAD_WORK_UNIT.

A clip from the log:
[18:33:51] GUI Server started
[18:33:51] Completed 0 out of 499375 steps (0%)
[18:33:51] WARNING: Caught signal SIGILL(4) on PID 3580
[18:33:51] WARNING: Unexpected exit from science code
[18:33:51] Saving result file logfile_09.txt
[18:33:51] Saving result file checkpt
[18:33:51] Saving result file log.txt
[18:33:51] Saving result file protomol.conf
[18:33:51] Saving result file ww.150.pos
[18:33:51] Saving result file ww.150.vel
[18:33:51] Saving result file ww.dcd
[18:33:51] Folding@home Core Shutdown: BAD_WORK_UNIT
[18:33:54] CoreStatus = 72 (114)
[18:33:54] Sending work to server
[18:33:54] Project: 10014 (Run 4419, Clone 0, Gen 2)
[18:33:54] - Read packet limit of 540015616... Set to 524286976.

[18:33:54] + Attempting to send results [April 15 18:33:54 UTC]
[18:33:54] - Reading file work/wuresults_09.dat from core
[18:33:54]   (Read 51150 bytes from disk)
[18:33:54] Connecting to http://129.74.85.15:8080/
[18:34:04] Posted data.
[18:34:04] Initial: 0000; - Uploaded at ~5 kB/s
[18:34:04] - Averaged speed for that direction ~7 kB/s
[18:34:04] + Results successfully sent
[18:34:04] Thank you for your contribution to Folding@Home.

It does count EARLY_UNIT_END failures.

What is the expected output for the proposed enhancement?
count both E_U_E and B_W_U as failures.

What version of the product are you using?
4.11-161

Original issue reported on code.google.com by cprichar...@gmail.com on 15 Apr 2010 at 7:16

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by harlam357 on 18 Apr 2010 at 12:24

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Marked Fixed for Revision 163.

Original comment by harlam357 on 18 Apr 2010 at 5:49