Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
I agree the phrasing of the package-level javadocs is too indirect. I would
suggest
this be pushed off to 1.3 as I forsee a lot of other javadoc improvements being
made
at that point.
Original comment by heue...@gmail.com
on 15 Jul 2008 at 4:27
Ok, let's get 1.2.1 out of the door and put this (and other javadoc issues as
you
mentioned) into 1.3.
I consider the issue as accepted and will start working on it after 1.2.1 is
finished.
Original comment by mr.rohrm...@googlemail.com
on 17 Jul 2008 at 1:38
Original comment by mr0...@mro.name
on 29 Jul 2008 at 1:39
Original comment by mr0...@mro.name
on 29 Jul 2008 at 1:40
I'm all for this, if you can get it in quickly.
Original comment by heue...@gmail.com
on 21 Oct 2009 at 2:24
I'm not for this since clicking on a package in the javadocs and expecting
helpful
easy to read documentation would hardly be met by ariving at a single word
"Activities"
Original comment by allain.lalonde
on 21 Oct 2009 at 9:12
Original comment by mr0...@mro.name
on 25 Oct 2009 at 6:50
Original comment by allain.lalonde
on 30 Oct 2009 at 4:13
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
mr.rohrm...@googlemail.com
on 11 Jul 2008 at 8:25