Closed GordonLesti closed 8 years ago
Hi @GordonLesti
I think what you did here is a great solution. I really like the idea of the cacheitem object. That makes it easier to extend if there is needed to add new elements to the cache.
The only "downside" I can think of right now is that the serialization of the object is about 100 bytes larger than for an array serialization, but looking at the big picture that is proably nothing to worry about.
Yes, I guess you are right. I will improve that tomorrow.
@kurtinge better?
I think this looks very good.
Hello @kurtinge please review as this is build on your Cache the response content-type header.