Open XVilka opened 2 years ago
I'd like to throw in a +1 for this and say that, while I am not a programmer by any means whatsoever, my cursory research seems to indicate that this could be started by replacing the standard format
header with fmt and any std::(format function)
calls to fmt::(format function)
?
Am I misunderstanding this?
(it also appears to say that it replaces iostreams
, which I also saw in some of the source)
Taskwarrior would greatly benefit from allowing color themes with more than just 256 colors. Currently, most of the terminal emulators on all common platforms support this feature, and many programs like Vim use it.
All up-to-date information is available here: https://github.com/termstandard/colors
It can be tested with the following command:
The 256-color palette is configured at start and is a 666-cube of colors, each of them defined as a 24-bit (888 RGB) color.
This means that current support can only display 256 different colors in the terminal while "truecolor" means that you can display 16 million different colors at the same time.
Truecolor escape codes do not use a color palette. They just specify the color directly.
This is a good test case:
Keep in mind that it is possible to use both ';' and ':' as Control Sequence delimiters.
According to Wikipedia[1], this behavior is only supported by xterm and konsole.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ANSI_color
Truecolor Detection
Checking for COLORTERM
VTE, Konsole and iTerm2 all advertise truecolor support by placing
COLORTERM=truecolor
in the environment of the shell user's shell. This has been in VTE for a while, but is relatively new in Konsole and iTerm2 and has to be enabled at compile time (most packages do not, so you have to compile them yourself from the git source repo).The S-Lang library has a check that
$COLORTERM
contains either "truecolor" or "24bit" (case sensitive).Terminfo has supported the 24-bit TrueColor capability since ncurses-6.0-20180121, under the name "RGB". You need to use the "setaf" and "setab" commands to set the foreground and background respectively.
Having an extra environment variable (separate from
TERM
) is not ideal: by default it is not forwarded via sudo, ssh, etc, and so it may still be unreliable even where support is available in programs. (It does however err on the side of safety: it does not advertise support when it is not actually supported, and the programs should fall back to using 8-bit color.)These issues can be ameliorated by adding
COLORTERM
to:SendEnv
list in/etc/ssh/ssh_config
on ssh clients;AcceptEnv
list in/etc/ssh/sshd_config
on ssh servers; andenv_keep
list in/etc/sudoers
.Despite these problems, it's currently the best option, so checking
$COLORTERM
is recommended since it will lead to a more seamless desktop experience where only one variable needs to be set.App developers can freely choose to check for this variable, or introduce their own method (e.g. an option in their config file). They should use whichever method best matches the overall design of their app.
Ideally any terminal that really supports truecolor would set this variable; but as a work-around you might need to put a check in
/etc/profile
to setCOLORTERM=truecolor
when$TERM
matches any terminal type known to have working truecolor.Querying The Terminal
In an interactive program that can read terminal responses, a more reliable method is available, that is transparent to sudo & ssh.
Simply try sending a truecolor value to the terminal, followed by a query to ask what color it currently has. If the response indicates the same color as was just set, then truecolor is supported.
If the response indicates an 8-bit color, or does not indicate a color, or if no response is forthcoming within a few centiseconds, then assume that truecolor is not supported.
Here we set the background color to
RGB(1,2,3)
- an unlikely default choice - and request the value that we just set. The response comes back that the request was understood (1
), and that the color is indeed48:2:1:2:3
. This tells us also that the terminal supports the colon delimiter. If instead, the terminal did not support truecolor we might see a response likeThis terminal replied that the color is
40
- it has not accepted our request to set48:2:1:2:3
.This terminal did not even understand the
DECRQSS
request - its response wasCSI
+0$r
. This does not indicate whether it set the color, but since it doesn't understand how to reply to our request it is unlikely to support truecolor either.Truecolor Support in Output Devices
Fully Supporting
Terminal Emulators
lscolors
to see a truecolor test)There are a bunch of libvte-based terminals for GTK2, so they are listed in the another section.
Multiplexers
--truecolor
option)Re-players
Partial Support
These terminal emulators parse ANSI color sequences, but approximate the true color using a palette or limit number of true colors that can be used at the same time. A 256-color (8-bit) palette is used unless specified.
Note about color differences
Human eyes are sensitive to the primary colors in such a way that the simple Gaussian distance √(R²+G²+B²) gives poor results when trying to find the "nearest" available color as perceived by most humans.
The CIEDE2000 formula provides much better perceptual matching, but it is considerably more complex and may perform very slowly if used blindly [2].
[2] https://github.com/neovim/neovim/issues/793#issuecomment-48106948
Not Supporting Truecolor
Console Programs + Truecolor
Console Programs Supporting Truecolor
ls
program that supports iconsConsole Programs Not Supporting Truecolor