Closed muczc1wek closed 3 weeks ago
The language server is AFAIK tool agnostic, it's not bound to VS Code, but the extension using the language server is.
So how should I put this? I know dls != vscode-daedalus, but for the regular user these things are the same
Perhaps they're seen as the same, but docs should strive for factuality. Of course there are some opinionated takes here or there, but there should be a good reason for those.
Here instead of "Also known as Daedalus Language Server", for example change it to "The VS Code extension acts as a proxy for the Daedalus Language Server to provide [list of features]" or "The VS Code extension provides [list of features] and uses Daedalus Language Server as the back-end for them." etc. maybe ChatGPT has something better.
LGTM, nice work on the preservation of the Gothic Sourcer in a separate repository 👍 You can squash merge when you want :v:
The language server is AFAIK tool agnostic, it's not bound to VS Code, but the extension using the language server is. I also think if there are alternative tools to some aspects of Gothic Sourcer, then the article should have an opinionated comment about this, but I don't know about alternative 😆