Closed qianyizhang closed 5 years ago
Hi, can you save the processed image and see the results?
what do you mean. it's not an empty image, but pretty much the same as
mask = trimapi>0
alphamapi = 255 * mask
so I wonder if that's due to the default config, or something wrong with the opencv_mat?
After using
new_ann, new_img = get_new_data(ori_anns: list,
ori_img: np.ndarray,
config: InstaBoostConfig,
background: np.ndarray)
you can get a new image, can you post some images here? We can check these new images to see if opencv_mat has effect
sorry for the delay, got caught up with works. heres a link for 3 sets of images, each processed by get_new_data with default config, where the original one is imageid_orig.jpeg (taken from coco2017)
https://postimg.cc/gallery/1shiasqt0/
hope this helps. happy moon-cake festival :P,
Haha thanks, happy moon-cake festival :P. I checked the images you generated, the matting is fine:D
Have fun!
i randomly process 50 coco examples with get_instance_group.extract() and default config step by step it seems global_matting does not have ANY effect to the image, does it make sense?
i make the following change after line 173 https://github.com/GothicAi/InstaBoost-pypi/blob/master/instaboost/get_instance_group.py#L173