[Feature]: Is it possible to have the option to choose the age as an alternative to having it automatically detected?

[Dr4zin]

Feature description

Since even the same subject often receives an age detection that differs a lot depending on the photo chosen, I wondered if it would be possible to specify the subject age (source face and target face) with an option, so that it can be "locked".

[Gourieff]

It can be implemented, but age detection has very low accuracy especially when you try to detect children There will be a lot of incorrect detections, I already tested this feature and unfortunately current genderage model (as part of buffalo_l) is not very accurate in age detection

[drdancm]

Not only age, but gender detection is also very unreliable.

[hboxgames]

It can be implemented, but age detection has very low accuracy especially when you try to detect children There will be a lot of incorrect detections, I already tested this feature and unfortunately current genderage model (as part of buffalo_l) is not very accurate in age detection

since dectectioon has low accuracy, then maybe it's even better to have option for manually specifying ? For the same person, I usually get 20 - 30 - 54 etc randomly. I might be worth just typing ourselves when it happens ?

[drdancm]

Manually specifying does not make any sense - just think about it. Even gender detection is often wrong. Your only recourse is to specify the head using 0 or 1, or 2, etc. If two heads are even somewhat close to each other it fails totally and you get distorted pixels, and out of focus faces.

[theSplund]

If we have the option to select gender, and that's currently not reliable, then why not remove it? Alternatively, give the option to 'unreliably' use an age/age range - it might work for some under certain conditions