License name order
The order of the resolved license name is impractical (for us, maybe for others, too). Instead of having the full name in front and the abbreviation in brackets behind that, the other way round would be better.
Example: If you have a filter that caps text, the licenses would be displayed as "Creative Commo..." and "Creative Commo..." instead of "CC 0 (Creati..." and "CC BY (Creati...".
For that reason, we currently work with our own vocabulary based on the official one. We wanted to share this here, as others might come across the same problem and adjusting the official vocabulary might help?
Example:
`
cc-by/4.0_originalCC BY 4.0 (Creative Commons Namensnennung – 4.0 International)CC BY 4.0 (Creative Commons Namensnennung – 4.0 International)CC BY 4.0 (Creative Commons Namensnennung – 4.0 International)cc-by/4.0Freie Nutzung
`
Hi!
While working on Open Data Bavaria, we had an issue regarding the license vocabulary https://www.dcat-ap.de/def/licenses/
License name order The order of the resolved license name is impractical (for us, maybe for others, too). Instead of having the full name in front and the abbreviation in brackets behind that, the other way round would be better. Example: If you have a filter that caps text, the licenses would be displayed as "Creative Commo..." and "Creative Commo..." instead of "CC 0 (Creati..." and "CC BY (Creati...".
For that reason, we currently work with our own vocabulary based on the official one. We wanted to share this here, as others might come across the same problem and adjusting the official vocabulary might help?
Example: `