Super minor UX change that puts each remote host in their own subdirectory

[openprivacy]

Not sure why it says it can't automatically merge this - seems to be a single character change. I'm using this change now for a client and it's much better for remote scanning.

[gregelin]

@openprivacy Here is the conflict that is showing up in the merge code, starting at line 822.

I am not sure why the side-by-side file comparison is not showing the same thing.

    # Check to see if we are to scan a remote machine using oscap-ssh.
    if [ -n "${OSCAP_USER+x}" ] && [ -n "${OSCAP_HOST+x}" ] && [ -n "${OSCAP_PORT+x}" ]; then
<<<<<<< HEAD
    if [ -n "${OSCAP_SUDO+x}" ] && [ "${OSCAP_SUDO}" ]; then
        SUDO_ARG='sudo'
    else
        SUDO_ARG=''
    fi
        OSCAP_COMMAND="oscap-ssh ${SUDO_ARG} ${OSCAP_USER}@${OSCAP_HOST} ${OSCAP_PORT}"
        RESULTS_DIR=${SCANDIR}/${PROFILE}-${OSCAP_HOST}
=======
        OSCAP_COMMAND="oscap-ssh ${OSCAP_USER}@${OSCAP_HOST} ${OSCAP_PORT}"
        RESULTS_DIR=${SCANDIR}/${PROFILE}/${OSCAP_HOST}
>>>>>>> ceb54a9c0b5e3c4fa4a52a08bd809212827ad239
        SSH_HOST="${OSCAP_USER}@${OSCAP_HOST}"

[gregelin]

@fen Temporarily commented out conflicting code, but we need to test together.

[openprivacy]

Yeah, things got confused as I made both my pull requests from master, and I see there is some conflicting code. Fixing...