GovXS / Evaluating-Voting-Design-Tradeoffs-for-Retro-Funding

Measure how different Retro Funding voting designs perform against a number of requirements aimed at optimizing different objectives. Achieved by simulating different types of voter behavior and applying formal reasoning.
MIT License
0 stars 0 forks source link

Submit Evaluation Plan #4

Closed AngelaKTE closed 2 months ago

AngelaKTE commented 2 months ago

Description

In our proposal for RfP #188 we state our Milestones: https://github.com/ethereum-optimism/ecosystem-contributions/issues/188#issuecomment-2153325539 Milestone 1 – Mid July Requirements doc agreed upon and submitted (see 1. Requirements and voting designs to evaluate) Milestone 2 – Mid August Quantitative Tests completed (see 2. Quantitatively test voting designs via data simulations) Milestone 3 – End of August Report and Recommendations delivered (see 3. Compile findings and recommendations in a written memo)

For Milestone 1, we state:

In the evaluation plan, we’ll specify the methods we apply and select the approaches that fit the requirements best.

✅ July 24 ISSUE COMPLETED
Evaluation Plan submitted and
Milestone 1 accepted by client

linear[bot] commented 2 months ago

GOV-13 Submit Evaluation Plan