GovXS / OP-Evaluating-Voting-Design-Tradeoffs-for-Retro-Funding

Measure how different Retro Funding voting designs perform against a number of requirements aimed at optimizing different objectives. Achieved by simulating different types of voter behavior and applying formal reasoning.
MIT License
0 stars 0 forks source link

Discuss Moving Phantoms (Independent Market/Majoritarian Phantom) Voting Rules #21

Closed AngelaKTE closed 1 day ago

AngelaKTE commented 1 month ago

Description

In our report, we'd like to propose two alternative voting rules to meet OP's design objectives:

as variants of the Moving Phantoms Voting Rule.

Reference:

https://www.overleaf.com/project/667bebbdb70211dfcff39701

Todos:

Notes:

Open Questions:

linear[bot] commented 1 month ago
GOV-29 Discuss Moving Phantoms (Independent Market/Majoritarian Phantom) Voting Rules

### Description In our report, we'd like to propose two alternative voting rules to meet OP's design objectives: * Independent Market * Majoritarian Phantom as variants of the Moving Phantoms Voting Rule. #### Reference: [https://www.overleaf.com/project/667bebbdb70211dfcff39701](https://www.overleaf.com/project/667bebbdb70211dfcff39701) **Todos:** * Write easy to understand description of the voting rules * Summarize results, highlight strenghts (Major strenght: Strategy-Proofness!)

AngelaKTE commented 1 day ago