search

Gozargah / Marzban

Unified GUI Censorship Resistant Solution Powered by Xray
https://t.me/gozargah_marzban
GNU Affero General Public License v3.0
3.74k stars 515 forks source link

Adding Sing-Box #674

Closed Hiradpi closed 10 months ago

Hiradpi commented 11 months ago

I propose integrating Sing-Box Core into Marzban and enabling a switch between Xray-Core and Sing-Box Core.

Sing-Box offers superior speed and diverse functionalities like WireGuard outbound connections (Warp) and inbound/outbound chaining. Currently, I'm using a SOCKS proxy outbound connection to link the panel's X-ray Core to Sing-Box Core, but it's causing performance issues.

Integrating Sing-Box Core directly would optimize system performance and enable seamless utilization of its advanced features within Marzban. This enhancement would significantly benefit users and elevate Marzban's capabilities.

APT-ZERO commented 11 months ago

Making Marzban multi-core is a great idea There is also API for accounting here https://github.com/MatsuriDayo/sing-box-extra

Hiradpi commented 11 months ago

well he has a point btw im facing a bug rn that doesn't let me open ports on 443 or 3309 or 80 and I double checked they are not being used it just says permission denied

SaintShit commented 11 months ago

I propose integrating Sing-Box Core into Marzban and enabling a switch between Xray-Core and Sing-Box Core.

Sing-Box offers superior speed and diverse functionalities like WireGuard outbound connections (Warp) and inbound/outbound chaining. Currently, I'm using a SOCKS proxy outbound connection to link the panel's X-ray Core to Sing-Box Core, but it's causing performance issues.

Integrating Sing-Box Core directly would optimize system performance and enable seamless utilization of its advanced features within Marzban. This enhancement would significantly benefit users and elevate Marzban's capabilities.

I can't see the superiority of Sing-box. to my knowledge, Sing-box is a great core for the client, but I don't see much for the server. although the benchmark results mentioned in its documentation say it's faster, the results were different in my tests.

The two features you mentioned are included in Xray-core already ( wireguard outbound and fallbacks ). if you're experiencing bad performance with socks outbound, might links below be useful for you. using "redirect" in freedom outbound using sockopts or simply setup a wireguard connection.

By the way, my first attempt to work with v2ray_api of Sing-box wasn't successful. and this doesn't mean that it's not possible to have Sing-box in Marzban in the future, just at this moment, it's not a priority.

kiomarzsss commented 5 months ago

@Hiradpi @SaintShit hi friends im trying to implement sing-box in oblivion-desktop. anyone can give me a hint on: What configuration file should we define for sing-box (https://github.com/SagerNet/sing-box) to come and use the socks proxy that warp-plus creates (by default on 127.0.0.1:8086) and Tunnel all network traffics (TUN)?

Hiradpi commented 5 months ago

hello you need to whitelist warp-plus prosses using routing rules and then use tun mode as an inbounds and a socks5 as an outbound and then route incoming connection to proxy's outbound Good luck

kiomarzsss commented 5 months ago

thanks @Hiradpi this was very helpful. is it ok with you to mention your username in changelog when tun feature comes to the app?

Hiradpi commented 5 months ago

yes thank you happy to help