Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
Sorry, ment the OCRxy registers, of course.
Original comment by al...@arcor.de
on 30 Jan 2011 at 6:13
Agreed, seems like at least OCR5B and OCR5C are not even set (channels 0 and 1)
?
This might explain why I have two engines on my hex that stop much earlier than
others at low throttle ?
//OCR5B = 3000; //PL4, OUT0
//OCR5C = 3000; //PL5, OUT1
Original comment by kidogof...@gmail.com
on 1 Feb 2011 at 2:46
Channel 0+1 run on OCR5B+OCR5C, so they also have to be initialized to 1ms. The
bad initialisation caused a major problem in the AeroQuad code. ESCs were not
initialized correctly and behaving mad.
Original comment by al...@arcor.de
on 1 Feb 2011 at 5:35
I just finished checking the PWM outputs with an old oscilloscope, and indeed
you're right. The PWMs on my hexa run at around 730Hz (not an exact science and
not an exact scope). 730Hz is 730 times per second, so 1000ms/730 = 1.34ms.
Sounds about right, but really wrong :)
I believe the margin there is way too high to expect ESCs to behave reliably.
I set to 2000, and uncommented the values for
OCR1B,OCR1C,OCR3B,OCR3C,OCR5B,OCR5C,OCR4B,OCR4C. That's all the output
channels, 8 of them.
I do believe I see a difference with at least one of my ESCs that would
sometimes flutter somewhat - the flutter is now gone.
Original comment by kidogof...@gmail.com
on 1 Feb 2011 at 7:44
No matter how old the scope is, it can handle 730 Hz, but no standard ESC can,
and the source code allows only 200 Hz if the Force_Out* functions are called.
Are you mixing up signal high time with Hz by mistake ?
Original comment by al...@arcor.de
on 1 Feb 2011 at 10:57
Errr yes... my fault ;) Sorry about that... it's been a long while since I used
anything like a scope. Had to go up to the attic and crawl for a while before I
found it :D
Original comment by kidogof...@gmail.com
on 1 Feb 2011 at 11:38
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
al...@arcor.de
on 30 Jan 2011 at 6:09