Closed Psi58 closed 2 months ago
Too little is seen in your odf information to say anything for sure.
However, I've done a test myself. Using the built in setter divisionals together with the divisional couplers will unfortunately crash GO. Using the old style of odf divisionals seems to work in my tests. I attach an archive with two .organ files that demonstrate it. (The .organ file with the "OldStyle" divisionals is also named like that)
Too little is seen in your odf information to say anything for sure.
However, I've done a test myself. Using the built in setter divisionals together with the divisional couplers will unfortunately crash GO. Using the old style of odf divisionals seems to work in my tests. I attach an archive with two .organ files that demonstrate it. (The .organ file with the "OldStyle" divisionals is also named like that)
Many thanks. Your demonstration behaves as described in my environment too. I will attempt to convert my odf to use old style divisionals, and will report back.
Hmm. I'm sorry, but I am struggling to understand how to implement old style divisionals. Is there documentation somewhere about how to use them? Or a well-commented sampleset that uses them, that I can study?
If I understand correctly from FurtherTestingDivisionalCouplerOldStyle.organ these are hard-coded into the ODF of the sampleset.
Furthermore, they must be displayed on Panel000 (specified in [Panel000Element999], to allow a piston (or any MIDI device) to then be linked to them.
And a Divisional Coupler will interact with these divisionals, not those defined in the GO Divisionals panel. (I cannot find any way to link these ODF-divisionals to the GO-panel-divisionals).
Is this understanding correct?
In my case I am trying to implement
So maybe I am trying to do the impossible?
Anyway, I can see that using the old style divisionals is deprecated. So perhaps I am getting distracted from the primary issue which is that Divisional Couplers are not currently working with divisionals as defined in the GO panel.
Anyway, I can see that using the old style divisionals is deprecated.
No, not really. They still have some use cases (mostly for modelling fixed combinations - but they can still be used as normal divisionals that the user can change at will if they are not protected). They are however a bit more restricted/complicated and less capable than the setter versions, but it's fairly easy to create them with GOODF without even learning so much of the mechanics involved. Just make sure to list relevant switches (if you use them) as references in the manual to make them available to the divisionals. In the screencast https://youtu.be/nitHpBEDsFI?list=PLNz9AJhjubTdw0pV2nZC_XfphJhJV5ly3&t=935 I've covered most that one would need to know.
And a Divisional Coupler will interact with these divisionals, not those defined in the GO Divisionals panel. (I cannot find any way to link these ODF-divisionals to the GO-panel-divisionals).
Currently the setter divisionals doesn't work with the divisional couplers, but that bug will eventually be fixed. Unfortunately, as it is right now, if the user tries to use the setter divisionals with a divisional coupler active that should affect them it will crash GO. And no, the odf divisionals cannot be linked with, or used as, the panel divisionals. To make the odf divisionals available to the user you must display them on any (at least one) panel of your choice.
So maybe I am trying to do the impossible?
Until the bug is fixed it's a no go for all your points. The only way to use a divisional coupler at this time is with the old style odf divisionals. But I'd expect things to change.
Thank you for explaining. I will be patient (and quiet) now, and hope that the bug fix is not too complex...
@Psi58 @larspalo I opened the FurtherTestingDivisionalCoupler.organ
but GrandOrgue (3.14.1-1) doesn't crash. Could you give me the steps to reproduce?
@Psi58 @larspalo I opened the
FurtherTestingDivisionalCoupler.organ
but GrandOrgue (3.14.1-1) doesn't crash. Could you give me the steps to reproduce?
Using 3.14.1-1 on Windows10.
Thanks @oleg68 for #1737 which evidently fixed the issue demonstrated by the test organ provided by @larspalo in #1725 (https://github.com/GrandOrgue/grandorgue/discussions/1690#discussioncomment-7613679).
Unfortunately this fix does not seem to have resolved my real-world case, using 3.13.3-1 on W10. This has been tested using 2 ways of making edits to add the DivCoupler - in a text editor and also using GOODF.
With the Divisional Coupler active, divisionals from the originating manual respond as expected, but the coupled divisionals do not respond, and an Unhandled Exception dialog box is shown. Clicking ‘ignore’ clears the error dialogue and allows me to continue; clicking ‘retry’ immediately terminates the program. Nothing is logged in the Event Viewer.
Attached is a comparison of the relevant sections of the ODF from (1) Lars’ test organ, (2) the working organ to which I’m trying to add a Divisional Coupler, and (3) the edited version of (2) adding the Divisional Coupler. I have aimed to make minimal changes to the test organ ODF.
If my ODF contains an error, I’d be grateful if someone could explain it. If not, I suppose this needs to be raised as an issue again.![DivCouplerError](https://github.com/GrandOrgue/grandorgue/assets/130241113/3bf520ae-2b65-435b-91f2-822fe0ed132a)