Closed VidithM closed 11 months ago
Sorry about that, I can't test the builds locally on v1.1 since my GraphBLAS doesn't have GrB_get/GrB_set. I have the latest stable version of GraphBLAS. Do I need to build my GraphBLAS from the GrB_get_set_proposal branch? How were you able to test if the build works?
Yes, you would need to compile LAGraph v1.1 against GraphBLAS 9.0.0 (in the GrB_get_set_proposal branch).
The CI for LAGraph will fail because it doesn't compile against v9.0.0, but that can be ignored.
seeing a compiler error here:
[ 96%] Building C object experimental/benchmark/CMakeFiles/coarsen_matching_demo.dir/coarsen_matching_demo.c.o
In file included from /home/faculty/d/davis/getset/LAGraph/experimental/benchmark/../../src/benchmark/LAGraph_demo.h:23,
from /home/faculty/d/davis/getset/LAGraph/experimental/benchmark/coarsen_matching_demo.c:1:
/home/faculty/d/davis/getset/LAGraph/experimental/benchmark/coarsen_matching_demo.c: In function ‘main’:
/home/faculty/d/davis/getset/LAGraph/src/utility/LG_internal.h:208:9: error: ‘LG_FREE_ALL’ undeclared (first use in this function)
208 | LG_FREE_ALL ; \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
/home/faculty/d/davis/getset/LAGraph/experimental/benchmark/coarsen_matching_demo.c:34:5: note: in expansion of macro ‘LG_TRY’
34 | LG_TRY (LAGraph_Random_Init (msg)) ;
| ^~~~~~
/home/faculty/d/davis/getset/LAGraph/src/utility/LG_internal.h:208:9: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
208 | LG_FREE_ALL ; \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
/home/faculty/d/davis/getset/LAGraph/experimental/benchmark/coarsen_matching_demo.c:34:5: note: in expansion of macro ‘LG_TRY’
34 | LG_TRY (LAGraph_Random_Init (msg)) ;
| ^~~~~~
make[3]: *** [experimental/benchmark/CMakeFiles/coarsen_matching_demo.dir/build.make:76: experimental/benchmark/CMakeFiles/coarsen_matching_demo.dir/coarsen_matching_demo.c.o] Error 1
@DrTimothyAldenDavis