Closed gmej closed 4 months ago
Hi @joofio. I was thinking on a easier PoC: If man, then greyout pregnancy sections. Is ok for you?
i was trying to avoid that issue, but assuming biological gender in order to be more accurate, i think it can work as well as with age. (over 75 - checked google ahaha)
hahahahhahahah perfect! I'll work on that
@joofio @jkiddo
I have a lense with the collapse functionality as a draft on our development server. You can test if you want.
Conditions: Works if patient is not biologically a woman or if being a woman is 75 years old or more.
Any feedback is welcome :)
content-type: application/json is working in dev?
Hello and happy new year! Yes, should be working.
happy new year :)
POST https://gravitate-health.lst.tfo.upm.es/focusing/focus/bundlepackageleaflet-2d49ae46735143c1323423b7aea24165?preprocessors=preprocessing-service-manual&lenses=lens-selector-mvp2_pregnancy-collapse&patientIdentifier=Pedro-1
content-type: application/json
This results as the same as without the content type. something changed?
Oh, its not Content-Type, its Accept
of course now it works! Thanks. This will be merged into pregnancy?
It can be left out as a separate lense, which in my opinion doesn't make sense, or be merged as you said. What you prefer the most.
Merged its better.
--
João Almeida MPharm, Msc, PhD Student LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/joaofilipealmeida/ | ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0882-6547 | Website http://joaofcalmeida.pt | gitHub https://github.com/joofio | e-Mais http://e-mais.pt| HL7 Portugal http://hl7.pt | @.*** http://cintesis.med.up.pt/ | IHE Pharmacy http://ihe.net
Alejandro Alonso López @.***> escreveu em ter., 9/01/2024 às 08:18 :
It can be left out as a separate lense, which in my opinion doesn't make sense, or be merged as you said. What you prefer the most.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/Gravitate-Health/focusing-manager/issues/27#issuecomment-1882595315, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADMJVUALVKLW4MAGDGH4DVDYNT4O3AVCNFSM6AAAAABAK6KZS6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQOBSGU4TKMZRGU . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
Ok so, as we are waiting for the review to finish, I cannot commit it to main, so I will create a new branch to do the "lense merge" task and then merge it to the develop branch to mark it as "ready to deploy on production". I will make you the reviewer of the PR just to make you know I've finished.
Wait I didn’t understand .
I was saying merge into the pregnancy lens, right ?
--
João Almeida MPharm, Msc, PhD Student LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/in/joaofilipealmeida/ | ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0882-6547 | Website http://joaofcalmeida.pt | gitHub https://github.com/joofio | e-Mais http://e-mais.pt| HL7 Portugal http://hl7.pt | @.*** http://cintesis.med.up.pt/ | IHE Pharmacy http://ihe.net
Alejandro Alonso López @.***> escreveu em ter., 9/01/2024 às 09:11 :
Ok so, as we are waiting for the review to finish, I cannot commit it to main, so I will create a new branch to do the "lense merge" task and then merge it to the develop branch to mark it as "ready to deploy on production". I will make you the reviewer of the PR just to make you know I've finished.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/Gravitate-Health/focusing-manager/issues/27#issuecomment-1882671328, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADMJVUDFHD6MJX4K6LK7CULYNUCT5AVCNFSM6AAAAABAK6KZS6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQOBSGY3TCMZSHA . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
Yes @joofio, but we still cannot upload this change to production.
ok but we can check the "merged" lens in dev right? now its "lens-selector-mvp2_pregnancy-collaps" correct?
No, that lens does not exist anymore. The lens with the collapse is "lens-selector-mvp2_pregnancy", but with applied changes. You can see the changes on https://github.com/Gravitate-Health/lens-selector-mvp2/pull/12
i think there is a bug, the class in style is collapsed and the attribute given is collapse (no "d")
Totally true, sorry, I fix it right now
Now working on dev, sorry for that typo
seems ok. Should we pass the mvp2 naming to mvp3?
the naming changed?
What are you referring to?
On martes, abr 02, 2024 at 4:27 p. m., João Almeida ***@***.***> wrote:
the naming changed?
—Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you were assigned.Message ID: ***@***.***>
***@***.***": ***@***.***": "EmailMessage","potentialAction": ***@***.***": "ViewAction","target": "https://github.com/Gravitate-Health/focusing-manager/issues/27#issuecomment-2032191780","url": "https://github.com/Gravitate-Health/focusing-manager/issues/27#issuecomment-2032191780","name": "View Issue"},"description": "View this Issue on GitHub","publisher": ***@***.***": "Organization","name": "GitHub","url": "https://github.com"}}]
lens-selector-mvp2_pregnancy-collaps the naming changed? is it pregancy only now? it says mvp2 still?
All lenses have the mvp2 tag, and the example is just inside the normal pregnancy lens
of course now it works! Thanks. This will be merged into pregnancy?
as we said here :)
All lenses have the mvp2 tag, and the example is just inside the normal pregnancy lens
of course now it works! Thanks. This will be merged into pregnancy?
as we said here :)
The MVP2 tag will eventually disappear
I will close this due to it's implemented inside pregnancy lens
I suggest: if adult, (check birthdate IPS), then greyout children sections