Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
we had prions originally but took them out, although i don't remember what the
problems were. i will make an
note to add them again.
Original comment by lindsay....@utsouthwestern.edu
on 27 Oct 2009 at 4:04
Original comment by lindsay....@utsouthwestern.edu
on 4 Nov 2010 at 3:52
Hi Lindsay,
When we just looked into the IDO definition, both the logical and textual still
only refer to organism:
http://www.ontobee.org/browser/rdf.php?o=IDO&iri=http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/
IDO_0000596
Original comment by bjoern.p...@gmail.com
on 6 May 2013 at 4:58
Hi Bjoern,
Thanks for your note. This has been one of those hotbed issues where we go
back and forth between "organism" and "material entity" to allow or disallow
the inclusion of prions (and all sorts of other things). No matter which way
we go, someone is up in arms (I'm sure you have that experience with OBI).
For the record, when we use organism, prions are excluded, as you point out.
When we use material entity, prions are included, which some people object to,
but the primary complaint is that other kinds of things are then also allowed,
such as the tasmanian devil face "cancer".
I think excluding prions will cause more problems for users and IDO
compatibility with other resources than allowing tasmanian face cancers, so I
will put revising the relevant terms in my queue.
If anyone strongly objects let me know.
Thanks,
Lindsay
Original comment by lindsay....@utsouthwestern.edu
on 6 May 2013 at 5:24
What's wrong with including the tasmanian devil face "cancer"?
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 1:24 PM,
<infectious-disease-ontology@googlecode.com>wrote:
Original comment by alanruttenberg@gmail.com
on 6 May 2013 at 9:29
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
bjoern.p...@gmail.com
on 27 Oct 2009 at 2:24