Closed buchananwp closed 10 months ago
Thanks Will! This is something we're going to be looking at moving forward also (terminology).
Thanks, Vaughan. Please pull Henry and I in when you’re ready for our review.
On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 7:49 PM Vaughan Knight @.***> wrote:
Thanks Will! This is something we're going to be looking at moving forward also (terminology).
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/Green-Software-Foundation/carbon-aware-sdk/issues/215#issuecomment-1350231856, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACEFHEUTSCA3NGBZH7JB36LWNERSHANCNFSM6AAAAAAS5IODZM . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.*** com>
--
Best, Will
This issue has not had any activity in 120 days. Please review this issue and ensure it is still relevant. If no more activity is detected on this issue for the next 20 days, it will be closed automatically.
Is this still in-progress?
This issue has not had any activity in 120 days. Please review this issue and ensure it is still relevant. If no more activity is detected on this issue for the next 20 days, it will be closed automatically.
This issue has not had any activity for too long. If you believe this issue has been closed in error, please contact an administrator to re-open, or if absolutly relevant and necessary, create a new issue referencing this one.
Contact Details
wibuchan@microsoft.com
What happened?
It's not a bug, it's a terminology suggestion.
emissions/average-carbon-intensity
For this query, the carbon-aware-sdk returns a mean marginal carbon intensity
'average' carbon intensity is an actual data type provided by WattTime and ElectricityMap. Marginal is a different type. Can we be consistent in our terminology?
client
WebAPI (Default)
Relevant log output
Code of Conduct