search

Green-Software-Foundation / carbon-aware-sdk

Carbon-Aware SDK
https://carbon-aware-sdk.greensoftware.foundation/
MIT License
456 stars 98 forks source link

Help Us Tell the Carbon Aware SDK Story #28

Closed vaughanknight closed 1 year ago

vaughanknight commented 2 years ago

We need help writing the Carbon Aware SDK Story

Reply below and we can start kicking off streams

srini1978 commented 2 years ago

I am interested in this

srini1978 commented 2 years ago

[

I am interested in this Adding a link to the WIP article . @vaughanknight can you please review #39

aradhika98 commented 2 years ago

I am interested too

Cooper-Cole commented 2 years ago

Happy to help here if the motion is still going! Is anyone leading this effort?

kunalmcitm commented 2 years ago

Happy to help if its still on.

danuw commented 2 years ago

Hi what is the latest on this? Happy to help too please?

tmcclell commented 2 years ago

I am too!

nicod-pc commented 1 year ago

For those who write the documentation it would be good if the Readme would describe what this peace of software is and actually does? Which functionality does it provide? How would you usually use it? Is it a plugin for a container management system? Or does it run jobs depending on the grid? I don't really understand what this is/does (and what it is not doing).

It would also be great to have some documentation about the calculations for CO2 reduction. As far as I know there are 3 factors:

So if a server is running anyway because of something necessary and utilizes 50% of the resources it is maybe more climate friendly to use the other 50% for some jobs with bad grid footprint, than to run an additional server to handle the increased load in times where there is green energy. Or even worse, to buy more hardware, to handle the load spikes in times with green energy. Is this software able to put this into consideration?

macco3k commented 1 year ago

I would love to contribute to documenting the project, but it is quite confusing as it is, both in terms of the sdk intended goal and its internals. I think it would be nice to have a dedicated documentation working group in order to add some more structure to it.

github-actions[bot] commented 1 year ago

This issue has not had any activity in 120 days. Please review this issue and ensure it is still relevant. If no more activity is detected on this issue for the next 20 days, it will be closed automatically.

github-actions[bot] commented 1 year ago

This issue has not had any activity for too long. If you believe this issue has been closed in error, please contact an administrator to re-open, or if absolutly relevant and necessary, create a new issue referencing this one.