Closed Sealjay closed 1 year ago
This issue is stale and will be closed at the next working group, because it has been open for 30 days with no activity. Remove ready-for-close label or comment to keep this going.
WG to approve either DCO or CLA at the next meeting
One question that came up internally: if we go with a DCO, who is going to draft it? And how will it be stored (where and by whom)?
@dtoakley-tw - usually the DCO adopts the standard LF template; https://developercertificate.org/ - I haven't seen any deviations from that personally.
If we use that, then we don't need to store it anywhere else
Motion: any objections to adopting the DCO No objections WG agree to adopt the DCO
Closing one as the DCO has been implemented!
DCO
source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Developer_Certificate_of_Origin
CLA
A formal agreement that individual contributors and members need to sign.
source: https://opensource.com/article/18/3/cla-vs-dco-whats-difference cc by sa attributed