Green-Software-Foundation / opensource-wg

GSF Open Source WG
Other
39 stars 8 forks source link

What's the best way for CarbonQL to proceed? #78

Closed Sealjay closed 1 year ago

Sealjay commented 1 year ago
          @Oleg-Zhymolokhov / @srini1978 gave an update in OSS WG:

looking for direction for the project to add value to existing projects. Originally planned for an API for those unfamiliar with SCI calculation to generate SCI score in user-friendly way. Feedback that a lot of companies are using Cloud Carbon Footprint and other APIs. @jawache gave suggestions for analysing this. 1) use sci-ontology project to drive the scope of the architecture of the application. aka: users build app architecture in SCI-Ontology. @navveenb making examples to provide ability to enter data, and sci-ontology would generate a score from that data. 2) CarbonQL to be an SDK that provides set of modules and applications to use these modules; describe the architecture in code, e.g. VMs in Azure or other cloud. Looking ahead, and figuring out where CarbonQL will have a sweet spot, looking at integration possibilities. SCI-Ontology has GUI for describing software boundary. Chatting with Amadeus at the moment.

Suggest discussing in GitHub to get input.

Originally posted by @Sealjay in https://github.com/Green-Software-Foundation/opensource-wg/issues/76#issuecomment-1497609828