search

Green-Software-Foundation / projects

The Green Software Foundation's Projects repository
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
0 stars 4 forks source link

2023 04 04 #20

Closed seanmcilroy29 closed 1 year ago

seanmcilroy29 commented 1 year ago

Time 1630pm (BST) - See the time in your timezone

Antitrust Policy

Joint Development Foundation meetings may involve participation by industry competitors, and it is the intention of the Joint Development Foundation to conduct all of its activities in accordance with applicable antitrust and competition laws. It is therefore extremely important that attendees adhere to meeting agendas, and be aware of, and not participate in, any activities that are prohibited under applicable US state, federal or foreign antitrust and competition laws.

If you have questions about these matters, please contact your company counsel or counsel to the Joint Development Foundation, DLA Piper.

Roll Call

Please add 'Attended' to this issue during the meeting to denote attendance. Any untracked attendees will be added by the GSF team below:

Agenda

Proposed new projects

Governance

Process Improvement

Regular updates

Rhythm of business

Resource Request

For closure/agenda removal

AOB

Adjourn

jawache commented 1 year ago

@seanmcilroy29 is this a placeholder with a plan to tighten up this agenda before the next meeting? Lots of what's on there has already been discussed last meeting.

seanmcilroy29 commented 1 year ago

@jawache - Yeah, it's a placeholder, so as new discussion topics are submitted, the Agenda can be prioritised accordingly. There were a few open-ended issues from the last meeting, that have been added under 'Update'.

jawache commented 1 year ago

@seanmcilroy29 / @Sealjay / @tmcclell - Can we priorities agenda items around moving projects through the project lifecycle, or perhaps have a section at the top to make sure those are covered first? It's a primary purpose of this group and since it meets once a month to avoid blockages we should prioritize those discussions.

Sealjay commented 1 year ago

I think we should discuss that urgently, but I'd argue it's as important a priority as to whether we accept external IP, given the number of external projects trying to donate to us. I don't think we should become a dumping ground for new projects. @tmcclell @seanmcilroy29 - also, can we try and move these conversations off the agenda?

Tammy and I haven't yet reviewed and refined the agenda. I've had a first stab at prioritising, but haven't run this by @tmcclell

jawache commented 1 year ago

I agree @Sealjay that's a great second big picture topic to discuss and it can only really happen in the OC.

One more thing I would suggest removing the updates for specific projects, those updates should be happening in the WG's, so the meetup update should happen in the Community WG meeting and any Carbon QL update happen in the OS WG meeting.

Sealjay commented 1 year ago

I agree @Sealjay that's a great second big picture topic to discuss and it can only really happen in the OC.

One more thing I would suggest removing the updates for specific projects, those updates should be happening in the WG's, so the meetup update should happen in the Community WG meeting and any Carbon QL update happen in the OS WG meeting.

I agree. I didn't add these to the agenda. I want to review with @tmcclell before making any big changes. I've re-arranged the order and grouped only.

Sealjay commented 1 year ago

Attended!

seanmcilroy29 commented 1 year ago

Attended

atg-abhishek commented 1 year ago

attended

greenhsu123 commented 1 year ago

Attended.

srini1978 commented 1 year ago

attended

camcash17 commented 1 year ago

Attended