Open will-iamalpine opened 2 years ago
@buchananwp to ask the UW students who will be working on this to make a PR referencing this issue. The PR will be against an appendix.
@buchananwp Will the final SCI value include the calculated value of M?
Yes, I will ask that the teams attempt to calculate M. I expect it to be quite difficult, but it would be a good challenge for them!
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 11:11 AM Srinivasan @.***> wrote:
@buchananwp https://github.com/buchananwp Will the final SCI value include the calculated value of M?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/Green-Software-Foundation/sci-data/issues/33, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACEFHEUAKL3PTIGVPMTJG63UXUQU7ANCNFSM5KQ6OZKA . Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675 or Android https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: <Green-Software-Foundation/software_carbon_intensity/issues/216/1019929455 @github.com>
--
Best, Will
@buchananwp we didn't end up creating a case study for this did we? Perhaps we can pick this up again given that you've published a paper on this? We have the folder for it here: https://github.com/Green-Software-Foundation/software_carbon_intensity/tree/dev/case-studies
cc @Henry-WattTime
Correct: we didn't create a case study. Happy to put together a summary in the format that's required, but I'd prefer to recycle existing content if possible (e.g. reference the paper directly. What's the timeline on this?
Note: we didn't incorporate embodied emissions (M). Unfortunately, I don't have bandwidth to apply these new numbers into our work.
Best, Will
On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 3:06 PM Abhishek Gupta @.***> wrote:
@buchananwp https://github.com/buchananwp we didn't end up creating a case study for this did we? Perhaps we can pick this up again given that you've published a paper on this? We have the folder for it here: https://github.com/Green-Software-Foundation/software_carbon_intensity/tree/dev/case-studies
cc @Henry-WattTime https://github.com/Henry-WattTime
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/Green-Software-Foundation/sci-data/issues/33, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACEFHEQNN3R4GFHB2UKO453VWKAWPANCNFSM5KQ6OZKA . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: <Green-Software-Foundation/software_carbon_intensity/issues/216/1198116038 @github.com>
Move to guidance document, link to academic paper that relays same information in more depth.
Overview
Machine Learning training consumes vast amounts of energy. In this test case, we will calculate the SCI delta between two convolutional neural networks (InceptionV3 and DenseNet) for an image classification scenario.
Sites for Software Sustainability Actions
Energy Efficiency
Hardware Efficiency (N/A)
This will not be an action taken in this test case. One could propose that a reduced training time would consequently reduce embodied carbon, but this is out of scope for the calculations.
Carbon Awareness
Procedure
(What) Software boundary
(Scale) Functional unit
r = Machine Learning training job
(How) Quantification method
(Quantify) SCI Value Calculation
Energy efficiency: carbon-aware findings:
(Report - WIP)
Disclose the software boundary and your calculation methodology, including items that you might not have included in the previous sections