hi @seanmcilroy29 , @jawache I just tripped over this too, and was about to make the same PR, as right now following the links to the spec on the front page of the repo results in arriving at broken links.
Would it be possible to either close this PR, or make the necessarty changes to the main branch?
Here's what I see:
And when I follow, the link to see the standard on github, I see this:
This isn't a great first experience for people coming to the spec, and it looks like an easy fix.
These links appear to be fixed in the dev branch, but the main branch, that most people would link to has the issue, and I think they should be linking to the following links as this PR suggests
hi @seanmcilroy29 , @jawache I just tripped over this too, and was about to make the same PR, as right now following the links to the spec on the front page of the repo results in arriving at broken links.
Would it be possible to either close this PR, or make the necessarty changes to the
main
branch?Here's what I see:
And when I follow, the link to see the standard on github, I see this:
This isn't a great first experience for people coming to the spec, and it looks like an easy fix.
These links appear to be fixed in the
dev
branch, but themain
branch, that most people would link to has the issue, and I think they should be linking to the following links as this PR suggestshttps://github.com/Green-Software-Foundation/sci/blob/main/SPEC.md https://github.com/Green-Software-Foundation/sci/blob/devSPEC.md
Linking to the 'live' site off of github.
Also, would you also consider linking to the compiled version of the site? It's useful to know it exists:
https://sci.greensoftware.foundation/