Review and update footprints, final round of general updates for 2023

[danrademacher]

Splitting this out from #57

This is the list of buildings that need review, as also documented here.

It is possible some of these exist in the 2015 Seattle Open Data, but I suspect mostly we need to digitize these, and then provide an updated set of the building outlines for Tom to populate in the application.

Dashboard link	Data Issue
43	Property is multi-building Boeing campus - MR
87	Building Footprint is not accurate - appears school was newly rennovated/rebuilt MR
172	South Seattle College Campus is currently displaying one building and a dot to the southeast of the site - MR
190	Wrong buildings selected, property is large warehouse - MR
212	Building currently displayed is tiny shack on the campus of a large school. - MR
215	The historic Rainier Bottling plant and Malt House building are next to eachother in Georgetown. The Bottling plant is North and the Malt House Building is South. Right now, they are displayed in reverse. Additionally the Bottling plant is lumping in another unrelated building a block away. - MR
225	Current footprint is tiny building on periphery of giant school building - MR
226	School has 4 structures on the property. I believe main structure is the only building actually benchmarked as the other structures appear to be portable classrooms and may not be conditioned. MR
266	Building display is across the street from actual building. - MR
19489	Partial building captured by shape. - MR
21610	Property is 6 building apartment complex, only 2 are currently displayed - MR
23050	This is a ~25 building apartment complex benchmarked as a single property, currently only 2 buildings are displaying - MR
23639	Multibuilding Apartment complex currently only displaying 2 shapes - MR
24030	Existing property displayed is tiny building on edge of lot, bulk of square footage is the main building on lot, currently not displaying. - MR
24150	Multibuilding Apartment complex - MR
24160	Multi-building apartment complex currently only displaying 2 shapes. - MR
24161	Multi-building apartment complex currently only displaying 2 shapes. - MR
24162	3 building apartment complex only displaying 2 buildings. - MR
24248	Wrong building footprint displayed - MR
24494	Property is actually a multi-building apartment complex. Currently displaying a single tiny building. - MR
24495	Property is multi-building apartment complext currently only displaying a single building. - MR
24496	Property is a 4 building apartment complex currently only displaying a single building. - MR
24645	Currently there are only 2 buildings displaying - according the KC assessor data, there are 7 buildings on the lot - MR
24854	Property is large multibuilding apartment complex currently displaying 2 buildings. - MR
24857	Property is currently displaying tiny shack on large lot with a shopping center. - MR
25131	Wrong building footprints display - Condo complex is long narrow building on the left side of the lot; everything else on the lot are car ports - MR
25299	Multibuilding Apartment complex - MR
25435	Currently only displaying 1 building; there are 4 buildings on the lot and the benchmarking record appears to correspond to all 4 buildings - MR
25652	Four building condo property only displaying 1 building -MR
25761	Property is 23 building apartment complex - currently only one building is displayed. Note that some structures on the site are car ports. - MR
26026	Data viz is displaying adjacent carport as a building - MR
37248	The historic Rainier Bottling plant and Malt House building are next to eachother in Georgetown. The Bottling plant is North and the Malt House Building is South. Right now, they are displayed in reverse. - MR
49699	Property is multi-building public storage facility that spans ~20 buildings - MR
49736	Only parts of the building displaying - MR
49911	It appears the footprint is duplicated/overlapping? - MR
50415	Property is 440k SF multi-building campus, not single small building - MR

[DariyaGIN]

I am doing a quick check to see how many of these actually need to be digitized / whether some of them are in the 2015 Seattle Open Data.

[joseph-stout]

Just to follow up here, Dariya found only one building footprint that needed digitizing after checking the missing IDs in the Seattle Open Data file, and digitized it herself. So I am of the understanding that this is resolved.

[DariyaGIN]

Correct. This task is now completed - I have reviewed all the new building footprints submitted by Mike. Almost all of them did not need to be digitized - I was able to grab the outlines from the 2015 Seattle Open Data shapefile, I digitized one of the footprints, and I ran the script that carries out the rest of the updates to the footprints, as requested by Mike. The updated file is in the project folder in the P drive.