Griesbacher / nagflux

A connector which copies performancedata from Nagios / Icinga(2) / Naemon to InfluxDB
GNU General Public License v2.0
67 stars 32 forks source link

[question] nagflux schema in omd #6

Closed rockaut closed 8 years ago

rockaut commented 8 years ago

Hello there,

is there anyway to modify the scheme data ist stored in influxdb? Since 0.9 i think are some additional possibilities (sums, filtering, etc. ) is data would be stores in a more structured way - like: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/33997430/obtaining-a-total-of-two-series-of-data-from-influxdb-in-grafana

Like a memory used check in nagios: there will be the used performance values with value, warning, critical and maximum values provided. Currently each are stored in single measurements like hostname&Memory used&check_mk-esx_vsphere_hostsystem.mem_usage&usage&value Why not storing those values in tags.

Griesbacher commented 8 years ago

Hey,

in Nagflux v0.2.0 I changes the Layout: https://github.com/Griesbacher/nagflux/releases/tag/v0.2.0 so maybe your using an older version. Have a look at it, maybe that's answering your question, if not let me know. If you're using only stable OMD, you'll have to wait for a new release, the "nightly" version has newer versions in it.

rockaut commented 8 years ago

Thats great. We're using 2.10 omd Labs edition so it's pretty fresh. But no troubles or rushing here if know that it's comming.

Thanks for your work. Am 15.05.2016 7:16 vorm. schrieb "Philip Griesbacher" < notifications@github.com>:

Hey,

in Nagflux v0.2.0 I changes the Layout: https://github.com/Griesbacher/nagflux/releases/tag/v0.2.0 so maybe your using an older version. Have a look at it, maybe that's answering your question, if not let me know. If you're using only stable OMD, you'll have to wait for a new release, the "nightly" version has newer versions in it.

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/Griesbacher/nagflux/issues/6#issuecomment-219266955