I18n and directory structure

Gubaer / josm-scripting-plugin

Task automation in the OpenStreetMap editor JOSM

https://gubaer.github.io/josm-scripting-plugin

GNU General Public License v3.0

26 stars 9 forks source link

I18n and directory structure #66

Closed floscher closed 6 years ago

floscher commented 6 years ago

This PR does two things:

In a9527b9ed5aa4b61dab2fae1de7f1d2eaf74f67b I moved the directories containing resources and the Java sources to the default locations for a Gradle project:
- contrib/ → src/main/resources/contrib/
- images/ → src/main/resources/images/
- resources/ → src/main/resources/resources/
- scripts/ → src/main/resources/scripts/
- src/ → src/main/java/
- (in the future translations would go into src/main/po/ or src/main/mo/)
4cbbd31e4c05f84085305ef029f9787a51eab06c then lets Travis CI send the translatable strings from the Java source code to Transifex. For this to work, you'd need two things:
- an API token for Transifex . Add the token as environment variable $TRANSIFEX_TOKEN to Travis CI.
- your account on Transifex would need the necessary rights to upload resources to the JOSM project

Gubaer commented 6 years ago

your account on Transifex would need the necessary rights to upload resources to the JOSM project

how can I apply for these righst? Are you the owner of the Transifex project who can grant them to me? I use the github identity Gubaer on Transifex too.

floscher commented 6 years ago

I'll add you as maintainer to the translation team. It was mentioned on the list, that it would be better to use the OpenStreetMap organization instead of the JOSM one. So I'll have to update this PR anyway.

floscher commented 6 years ago

You are now a maintainer and should have all necessary rights for https://www.transifex.com/openstreetmap/josm-plugins/ :wink:.

Gubaer commented 6 years ago

What'syour experience with travis stages? In contrast with the old travis configuration, the build doesn't run as smoothly with the .travis.yml (using stages) on the floischr-i18n branch. Do you use stages in other projects too, i.e. for the Mapillary plugin?

floscher commented 6 years ago

I only recently started to use them, only for the JOSM plugins that push to transifex. That's because the Transifex client needs Python (atm in exactly version 3.5) and that was the easiest way to realize that, one stage building with java, then a stage pushing to Transifex with python. I didn't realize noticable differences, it could be that what you see are general delays on Travis CI, they are having some issues today: https://www.traviscistatus.com/

Gubaer commented 6 years ago

it could be that what you see are general delays on Travis CI

most likely, yes. I'll try again later.

floscher commented 6 years ago

Actually I gave this another thought and concluded, that it would be better to add all JOSM plugins to the JOSM organization on Transifex for the time being. If needed in the future, the project could be transferred as a whole to the Openstreetmap organization. At the moment there's the licensing concerns with already translated plugins and I'd like to keep the plugins in one place at Transifex.

You are now added to both teams. For the moment I'd prefer https://www.transifex.com/josm/josm/ over https://www.transifex.com/openstreetmap/josm-plugins/ , but let's see how this evolves.