Simplify Infisical Secrets Check Workflow

guibranco commented 3 weeks ago

Description

Replaced the existing steps for running the Infisical secrets check with a single action.
Removed unnecessary installation and scanning commands, streamlining the workflow.
This change enhances the maintainability and readability of the GitHub Actions workflow.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files

Enhancement

infisical-secrets-check.yml

Simplify Infisical Secrets Check Workflow

.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml

Replaced multiple steps with a single action to run the Infisical
secrets check.

Simplified the workflow by removing redundant installation and
scanning steps.

Improved maintainability by using a dedicated action for secrets
checking.

+2/-131

Summary by Sourcery

Simplify the Infisical secrets check workflow by replacing the manual setup and execution steps with a single GitHub Action.

CI:

Replace the manual setup and execution of the Infisical secrets check with a pre-built GitHub Action, simplifying the workflow configuration.

Summary by CodeRabbit

New Features
- Streamlined secrets checking workflow using a dedicated action, improving maintainability and reliability.
Version Updates
- Updated assembly and file version numbers from 1.0.932.1 to 1.0.934.1, indicating potential bug fixes and enhancements.

semanticdiff-com[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

Review changes with SemanticDiff.

Analyzed 1 of 3 files.

	Filename	Status
:heavy_check_mark:	Src/GHActionsCI/Properties/AssemblyInfo.cs	Analyzed
:grey_question:	Src/GHActionsCI/Properties/Version.txt	Unsupported file format
:grey_question:	.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml	Unsupported file format

senior-dev-bot[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

Hi there! :wave: Thanks for opening a PR. It looks like you've already reached the 5 review limit on our Basic Plan for the week. If you still want a review, feel free to upgrade your subscription in the Web App and then reopen the PR

korbit-ai[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

You've used up your 5 PR reviews for this month under the Korbit Starter Plan. You'll get 5 more reviews on October 5th, 2024 or you can upgrade to Pro for unlimited PR reviews and enhanced features in your Korbit Console.

pr-code-reviewer[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

:wave: Hi there!

Everything looks good!

_{^{Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo.
Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at webber@takken.io.}}

sourcery-ai[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request simplifies the Infisical secrets check workflow by replacing the custom implementation with a pre-built GitHub action. The change reduces the complexity of the workflow and potentially improves maintainability.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Replace custom Infisical secrets check implementation with a pre-built GitHub action	Remove the manual setup of Infisical package source Remove the installation of additional tools (infisical, csvkit, csv-to-markdown-table) Remove the custom scan execution and report generation steps Remove artifact upload steps for various report files Remove steps for reading and processing report files Remove the custom PR comment update logic Add a single step to run the pre-built GitHub action for Infisical secrets check	`.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml`

Tips

- Trigger a new Sourcery review by commenting `@sourcery-ai review` on the pull request. - Continue your discussion with Sourcery by replying directly to review comments. - You can change your review settings at any time by accessing your [dashboard](https://app.sourcery.ai): - Enable or disable the Sourcery-generated pull request summary or reviewer's guide; - Change the review language; - You can always [contact us](mailto:support@sourcery.ai) if you have any questions or feedback.

codara-ai-code-review[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:

/.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml
- The entire block of steps related to setting up Infisical package source, installing tools, scanning, generating reports, uploading artifacts, reading files, and updating PR comments has been removed.
- This removal eliminates crucial steps in the workflow, affecting the scanning, reporting, and action based on the scan results. It seems like important functionalities have been unintentionally deleted.

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:

/.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml
- When replacing the entire previous block with a single line running the action guibranco/github-infisical-secrets-check-action@v1, ensure that the new action covers all the required functionalities that were previously present in the removed block.
- Consider verifying and documenting that the new action guibranco/github-infisical-secrets-check-action@v1 includes the necessary steps such as scanning, generating reports, uploading artifacts, and updating PR comments as needed for the workflow to function appropriately.

instapr[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

### Comments:
- Consider providing more details or context in the PR description.

gooroo-dev[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

Please double check the following review of the pull request:

Issues counts

🐞Mistake	🤪Typo	🚨Security	🚀Performance	💪Best Practices	📖Readability	❓Others
0	0	0	0	1	0	0

Changes in the diff

➖ Removed the steps to set the Infisical package source.
➖ Removed the steps to install tools like Infisical, csvkit, and csv-to-markdown-table.
➖ Removed the steps to run the Infisical scan and generate reports.
➖ Removed the steps to upload artifacts like secrets-result.log, secrets.csv, secrets-result.csv, secrets-result.md, and fingerprint.txt.
➖ Removed the steps to read the secrets-result.log, secrets-result.md, and fingerprint.txt.
➖ Removed the step to update the PR with a comment based on the scan results.
➕ Added a single step to run the action guibranco/github-infisical-secrets-check-action@v1.

Identified Issues

ID	Type	Details	Severity	Confidence
1	💪Best Practices	The new action `guibranco/github-infisical-secrets-check-action@v1` should be pinned to a specific commit SHA for security.	🔴High	🔴High

Issue 1: Pinning the Action to a Specific Commit SHA

Explanation

The new action guibranco/github-infisical-secrets-check-action@v1 is currently referenced by its version tag. For security reasons, it's a best practice to pin actions to a specific commit SHA to avoid potential issues with changes in the action's codebase.

Fix

Update the action reference to use a specific commit SHA.

-      - name: Run the action
-        uses: guibranco/github-infisical-secrets-check-action@v1
+      - name: Run the action
+        uses: guibranco/github-infisical-secrets-check-action@<specific-commit-sha>

Explanation of the Fix

By pinning the action to a specific commit SHA, you ensure that the action's code will not change unexpectedly, which can help prevent security vulnerabilities and maintain consistency in your workflow.

Missing Tests

Since the changes involve modifying a GitHub Actions workflow, traditional unit tests are not applicable. However, you should verify the workflow by running it in a test environment to ensure it behaves as expected. Ensure that the new action correctly performs the secrets check and updates the PR with the appropriate comments.

Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev React or reply to give me your feedback!

coderabbitai[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces significant changes to the GitHub Actions workflow for checking secrets using Infisical. It simplifies the process by consolidating multiple steps into a single action, enhancing maintainability. Additionally, the versioning information in the AssemblyInfo.cs and Version.txt files is updated, reflecting a new assembly version.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
`.github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml`	Replaced multiple steps with a single action `guibranco/github-infisical-secrets-check-action@v1.0.2`.
`Src/GHActionsCI/Properties/AssemblyInfo.cs`	Updated `AssemblyVersion` and `AssemblyFileVersion` from `1.0.932.1` to `1.0.934.1`.
`Src/GHActionsCI/Properties/Version.txt`	Updated version number from `1.0.932.1` to `1.0.934.1`.

Possibly related PRs

#292: Updates the infisical-secrets-check.yml file, directly related to the main PR's changes.
#302: Modifies the infisical-secrets-check.yml file, indicating a connection in the workflow configuration.
#341: Updates the guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2 action in the infisical-secrets-check.yml, relevant to the main PR.
#346: Continues updates to the guibranco/github-file-reader-action-v2 in the same workflow file, showing a direct relationship to the main PR.
#356: Enhances the infisical-secrets-check.yml workflow, aligning closely with the main PR's focus.
#382: Enhances the infisical-secrets-check.yml file, adding new functionality related to secrets detection.

Suggested labels

size/M, ☑️ auto-merge, Review effort [1-5]: 3

🐰 In the meadow, secrets hide,
With a hop and a skip, we glide.
A workflow now clean and bright,
Version numbers take flight!
Infisical’s checks, oh so neat,
In this garden, we dance on our feet! 🌼

[!TIP]

OpenAI O1 model for chat
- We have deployed OpenAI's latest O1 model for chat. - OpenAI claims that this model has superior reasoning capabilities than their GPT-4o model. - Please share any feedback with us in the [discussions post](https://discord.com/channels/1134356397673414807/1283929536186155099).

Recent review details

**Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI** **Review profile: CHILL**

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6c815ba0ece5c64473814b0c6f6ac86f132430e4 and d8a60d254ef45eeda2b92ae6950e8793c04122f7.

Files selected for processing (3)

* .github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml (1 hunks) * Src/GHActionsCI/Properties/AssemblyInfo.cs (1 hunks) * Src/GHActionsCI/Properties/Version.txt (1 hunks)

Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)

* .github/workflows/infisical-secrets-check.yml * Src/GHActionsCI/Properties/Version.txt

Additional comments not posted (2)

Src/GHActionsCI/Properties/AssemblyInfo.cs (2)
`47-47`: **LGTM!** The `AssemblyVersion` attribute has been correctly updated to reflect the new version of the assembly. This is a standard practice when releasing a new version of the software. --- `48-48`: **LGTM!** The `AssemblyFileVersion` attribute has been correctly updated to match the `AssemblyVersion`. Keeping these versions in sync is a good practice.

--- Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

- [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)

Tips

### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.

penify-dev[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

PR Review 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	2, because the changes are straightforward and primarily involve replacing multiple steps with a single action, which simplifies the workflow.
🧪 Relevant tests	No
⚡ Possible issues	No
🔒 Security concerns	No

penify-dev[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

PR Code Suggestions ✨

No code suggestions found for PR.

net-framework-updater[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

Build debug & Version bump: :beginner: Building GHActionsCI.sln

net-framework-updater[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

Build debug & Version bump: :dart: Build succeeded - New version: 1.0.934.1

net-framework-updater[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

Build debug & Version bump: :white_check_mark: Successfully builded and patched GHActionsCI.sln.

Version: :hash: 1.0.934.1 Warnings: :warning:

D:\a\POC-GHActions-CI-NetFramework\POC-GHActions-CI-NetFramework\Src\GHActionsCI\Program.cs(27,20): warning S1118: Add a 'protected' constructor or the 'static' keyword to the class declaration. (https://rules.sonarsource.com/csharp/RSPEC-1118) [D:\a\POC-GHActions-CI-NetFramework\POC-GHActions-CI-NetFramework\Src\GHActionsCI\GHActionsCI.csproj]

codeclimate[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

Code Climate has analyzed commit d8a60d25 and detected 0 issues on this pull request.

View more on Code Climate.

github-actions[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

Infisical secrets check: :white_check_mark: No secrets leaked!

Scan results:

5:02PM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
5:02PM INF 265 commits scanned.
5:02PM INF scan completed in 560ms
5:02PM WRN leaks found: 5

GuilhermeStracini / POC-GHActions-CI-NetFramework