GuilhermeStracini / POC-GHActions-CI-NetFramework

:microscope: Proof of Concept of a .NET Framework project using GitHub Actions for build, testing and deploy
https://guilhermestracini.github.io/POC-GHActions-CI-NetFramework/
MIT License
1 stars 0 forks source link

Create .infisicalignore for sensitive data management #387

Closed guibranco closed 3 weeks ago

guibranco commented 3 weeks ago

Description


Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Configuration changes
.infisicalignore
Create .infisicalignore for sensitive data management       

.infisicalignore
  • Added a new .infisicalignore file.
  • Included entries to ignore sensitive information in workflow files.
  • +5/-0     
    semanticdiff-com[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

    Review changes with SemanticDiff.

    senior-dev-bot[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

    Hi there! :wave: Thanks for opening a PR. It looks like you've already reached the 5 review limit on our Basic Plan for the week. If you still want a review, feel free to upgrade your subscription in the Web App and then reopen the PR

    korbit-ai[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

    You've used up your 5 PR reviews for this month under the Korbit Starter Plan. You'll get 5 more reviews on October 5th, 2024 or you can upgrade to Pro for unlimited PR reviews and enhanced features in your Korbit Console.

    pr-code-reviewer[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

    :wave: Hi there!

    Everything looks good!

    Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo. Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at webber@takken.io.

    sourcery-ai[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

    🧙 Sourcery has finished reviewing your pull request!


    Tips - Trigger a new Sourcery review by commenting `@sourcery-ai review` on the pull request. - Continue your discussion with Sourcery by replying directly to review comments. - You can change your review settings at any time by accessing your [dashboard](https://app.sourcery.ai): - Enable or disable the Sourcery-generated pull request summary or reviewer's guide; - Change the review language; - You can always [contact us](mailto:support@sourcery.ai) if you have any questions or feedback.
    codara-ai-code-review[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

    Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:

    1. Security Risk:
      • Storing specific secrets or keys directly in a file like .infisicalignore can be risky as it exposes sensitive information. This can lead to security breaches if accessed by unauthorized users.

    Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:

    1. Security Enhancement:
      • Avoid storing sensitive information like generic API keys in versioned files. Instead, consider using secure, environment-specific methods for managing secrets, such as environment variables or a secure vault.
      • It's advisable to update the workflow to use a more secure method for managing secrets, such as GitHub Secrets, Azure Key Vault, or AWS Secrets Manager.
      • Ensure that any exposed secrets in the repository are rotated regularly to reduce the risk of unauthorized access.
    gooroo-dev[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

    Please double check the following review of the pull request:

    Issues counts

    🐞Mistake 🤪Typo 🚨Security 🚀Performance 💪Best Practices 📖Readability ❓Others
    0 0 0 0 0 0 0

    Changes in the diff

    Identified Issues

    There are no identified issues as the diff does not contain any changes.

    Missing Tests

    Since there are no changes in the diff, no tests are required.

    Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev Feel free to react or reply with your feedback!

    instapr[bot] commented 3 weeks ago
    Nice work on creating the .infisicalignore file. The additions seem to be in order. Good job!
    codeclimate[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

    Code Climate has analyzed commit 595d7722 and detected 0 issues on this pull request.

    View more on Code Climate.

    penify-dev[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

    PR Review 🔍

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5] 1, because the changes are straightforward and involve adding a new configuration file without complex logic.
    🧪 Relevant tests No
    ⚡ Possible issues No
    🔒 Security concerns No
    coderabbitai[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

    [!WARNING]

    Rate limit exceeded

    @guibranco has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 5 minutes and 16 seconds before requesting another review.

    How to resolve this issue? After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the `@coderabbitai review` command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR. We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.
    How do rate limits work? CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our [FAQ](https://coderabbit.ai/docs/faq) for further information.
    Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e09d60f21320b48c7fe16f4d0456537baa2f2f55 and 595d772249e02e6f5d6d89dbad7238e8edb77479.

    Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

    Share - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)
    Tips ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit .` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.` - `@coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.
    penify-dev[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Security
    Review the entries for potential exposure of sensitive data ___ **Ensure that the entries in the .infisicalignore file do not expose sensitive information
    by reviewing the patterns and file paths included.** [.infisicalignore [1-5]](https://github.com/GuilhermeStracini/POC-GHActions-CI-NetFramework/pull/387/files#diff-c440210895fccd9ede7e44b5c9a75290ed1a288784b0df29d3eb7146f97df3d4R1-R5) ```diff +# Review and confirm that this entry does not expose sensitive information b529aaec8e2f6d2cd7aed2b8f94e31f4ee7f19bf:.github/workflows/build.yml:generic-api-key:49 ```
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: The suggestion addresses a potential security concern by prompting a review of sensitive information exposure, which is crucial for maintaining security best practices.
    8
    net-framework-updater[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

    Build debug & Version bump: :alien: Not building GHActionsCI.sln, no source files changed.

    github-actions[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

    Infisical secrets check: :white_check_mark: No secrets leaked!

    Scan results:

    5:11PM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
    5:11PM INF 262 commits scanned.
    5:11PM INF scan completed in 552ms
    5:11PM INF no leaks found